Long Beach, CA 90809-0129
1 October 2020 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (4 years, 7 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
---|---|
1 October 2020 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (4 years, 7 months ago) Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance |
14 June 2000 | Active (24 years, 10 months ago) |
15 April 2000 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (25 years ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 98-C-02986 |
17 March 1999 | Conviction record transmitted to State Bar Court 98-C-02986 (26 years, 1 month ago) |
18 December 1975 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (49 years, 4 months ago) |
April 15, 2000 MURRAY PALITZ [#67062], 63, of Westminster was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a 60-day actual suspension and was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect April 15, 2000. Palitz was arrested in an Orange County sting operation which focused on payments to non- attorneys for referrals of personal injury cases and splitting legal fees with non-lawyers.He was contacted by representatives of a fictitious consulting business which purported to need a lawyer to help them process personal injury cases.Palitz reluctantly processed one case through his office, introducing an investigator to his wife, who corresponded with the insurer and negotiated a settlement. He created a fee-splitting arrangement under which direct disbursements were made only to the client and his doctor. Palitz refused to disburse the funds without personally meeting the client and obtaining the client’s signature on settlement documents and the settlement checkThere was no indication Palitz encouraged padding any medical bills or otherwise engaged in insurance fraud by submitting inflated billings. He accepted only one case.Palitz was convicted of four counts of offering rebates as an inducement to client referral, misdemeanor violations of the Insurance Code, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $5,000 and complete 250 hours of community service.In mitigation, he practiced law for 24 years in the same location without any record of misconduct. He represented his purported client in good faith and believed he was paying the consulting firm for its considerable investigative work on the personal injury matter. He cooperated with law enforcement, reimbursed the insurer for the amount he received as fees and enrolled himself and his wife in a professional responsibility course upon his arrest. |