Alexander Zev Ribakoff was admitted to the California Bar 5th December 1979, but is now resigned. Alexander graduated from Pepperdine University SOL.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Alexander Zev Ribakoff |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 5 December 1979 (45 years, 5 months ago) |
| Status | Resigned |
| Bar Number | 97193 |
Contact
| Phone Number | 949-786-8920 |
|---|
Schools
| Law School | Pepperdine University SOL (Malibu CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | University of Rochester (Rochester NY) |
Address
| Current Address | 32 Woodfern Irvine, CA 92714 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 8 June 1996 | Resigned (28 years, 11 months ago) Resignation with charges pending 96-Q-01600 |
|---|---|
| 22 March 1996 | Vol.inactive(tender of resign.w/charges) 96-Q-01600 (29 years, 1 month ago) |
| 12 November 1995 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (29 years, 5 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 94-H-18081 |
| 21 April 1995 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (30 years ago) Ordered inactive 94-H-18081 |
| 6 December 1994 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 94-H-18081 (30 years, 5 months ago) |
| 29 October 1992 | Private reproval, public disclosure 91-O-06285 (32 years, 6 months ago) |
| 10 March 1992 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 91-O-06285 (33 years, 2 months ago) |
| 5 December 1979 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (45 years, 5 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
November 12, 1995 ALEXANDER ZEV RIBAKOFF [#97193], 42, of Irvine was suspended for two years, stayed, and placed on probation for two years on the condition that he actually be suspended for 30 days and until he makes restitution. If the period of actual suspension is two years or more, he will remain actually suspended until he has shown proof of his rehabilitation and fitness to practice law. If the period of actual suspension is 90 days or more, he must comply with Rule 955. The order took effect Nov. 12, 1995. Ribakoff was disciplined for violating certain conditions of a private reproval he received in October 1992. He neglected to file a quarterly probation report and provide proof that he made restitution to a client. In its decision, the hearing department of the bar court considered Ribakoff's failure to participate in formal proceedings prior to the default's entry and his failure to answer a notice to show cause as aggravating factors. No mitigating circumstances were found. |