Sacramento, CA 95833
12 June 2009 | Resigned (16 years ago) Resignation with charges pending 08-Q-13347 |
---|---|
28 August 2008 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (16 years, 9 months ago) Vol.inactive(tender of resign.w/charges) |
19 March 2004 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (21 years, 3 months ago) Ordered inactive |
28 February 2004 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (21 years, 3 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 02-PM-13802 |
16 August 2003 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (21 years, 10 months ago) Ordered inactive 02-PM-13802 |
24 March 2002 | Discipline, probation; no actual susp. 01-PM-01665 (23 years, 3 months ago) |
21 December 2000 | Active (24 years, 6 months ago) |
17 August 2000 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years, 10 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 99-PM-11242 |
3 February 2000 | Active (25 years, 4 months ago) |
11 August 1999 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (25 years, 10 months ago) Suspended, failed to pass Prof.Resp.Exam 96-O-04110 |
2 March 1999 | Active (26 years, 3 months ago) |
31 July 1998 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (26 years, 10 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 96-O-04110 |
10 April 1997 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 96-O-04110 (28 years, 2 months ago) |
7 February 1993 | Discipline, probation; no actual susp. 92-P-12660 (32 years, 4 months ago) |
20 April 1992 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 92-P-12660 (33 years, 2 months ago) |
22 June 1991 | Discipline, probation; no actual susp. 87-O-17892 (34 years ago) |
17 March 1989 | Public reproval with/duties 87-O-14091 (36 years, 3 months ago) |
16 December 1980 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (44 years, 6 months ago) |
February 28, 2004 JOHN INGRAHAM MEEKER [#95878], 55, of Sacramento Probation was revoked, his stay of suspension was lifted and he was actually suspended for two years and until he proves his rehabilitation. He also was ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 955. Credit shall be given for the period of involuntary inactive enrollment that began Aug. 16, 2003. The order took effect Feb. 28, 2004. The State Bar Court found that Meeker failed to comply with probation conditions attached to a 2002 discipline order — he did not file quarterly probation reports or submit a law office management plan.Meeker has six previous disciplines, including three prior probation revocation proceedings.August 17, 2000 The probation of JOHN INGRAHAM MEEKER [#95878], 50, of Roseville was revoked, the previous stay of suspension was lifted, and he was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on three years of probation with a six-month actual suspension, and was ordered to prove his rehabilitation and comply with rule 955. Credit will be given for a 60-day suspension previously served. The order took effect Aug. 17, 2000. Meeker was suspended and placed on probation in 1998 but violated the terms of his probation by not filing quarterly reports, not having an accountant review his trust account and not signing up for ethics school, trust accounting school or the professional responsibility exam. Although the bar was essentially shut down due to a funding crisis, the State Bar Court said the shutdown was not the basis for Meeker’s failure to comply.When he received a warning letter, he did attend ethics school, trust accounting school, and took, but did not pass, the PRE. He filed quarterly reports and belatedly had an accountant examine his books, but his statement did not show when monies went into and out of trust.At the time of his problems, Meeker was going through an acrimonious divorce, two close friends died, and when he was suspended for failing the professional responsibility exam, his income suffered. He is now undergoing counseling, has closed his law practice and works with a friend who manages the law office, and has retained ethics counsel.The discipline underlying the probation revocation was the result of trust account violations. In addition, Meeker was privately reproved in 1989, was given a stayed suspension in 1991, and his probation was extended in 1993 for failing to comply with its conditions.June 3, 1998 JOHN INGRAHAM MEEKER [#95878], 49, of Sacramento was suspended for two years and until he has provided proof of his fitness to practice. The suspension was stayed and he was placed on probation for three years with an actual suspension of 60 days. The order took effect June 3, 1998. Meeker's misconduct involved failure to maintain proper client trust account records, which resulted in bounced checks. In addition, he borrowed money from a client and did not advise the client to seek outside counsel regarding the loan. He also did not respond to inquiries from the State Bar or cooperate with the bar's investigation of the matter.In aggravation, Meeker has a prior record of discipline. In 1989, he received a public reproval and in 1991, a one-year stayed suspension. In 1993, his probation was extended for failing to comply with conditions of his stayed suspension.In mitigation, no clients were harmed by his misconduct and he took steps to atone for his wrongdoing by immediately depositing funds to cover the bounced checks.In addition, during the course of updating his office computer software, his system crashed, resulting in the loss of pertinent trust account records. |