Maureen Rochelle Kallins was first admitted to the California Bar 16th December 1980, but is now no longer eligible to practice. Maureen graduated from St John's University SOL.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Maureen Rochelle Kallins |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 16 December 1980 (44 years, 4 months ago) |
| Status | Not Eligible to Practice |
| Bar Number | 95038 |
Contact
| Current Email | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Phone Number | 360-693-4110 |
| Fax Number | 360-326-4440 |
Schools
| Law School | St John's University SOL (NY) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | University of Wisconsin (WI) |
Address
| Current Address | 2406 E 6th St Vancouver, WA 98661 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 13 October 2006 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (18 years, 6 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 03-O-05075 |
|---|---|
| 21 August 2005 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (19 years, 8 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 97-O-15422 |
| 29 September 2003 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (21 years, 7 months ago) Ordered Inactive/Fee Arb/B&P 6203 |
| 7 July 2003 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 97-O-15422 (21 years, 10 months ago) |
| 21 January 2002 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (23 years, 3 months ago) Ordered Inactive/Fee Arb/B&P 6203 |
| 21 January 2002 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (23 years, 3 months ago) Ordered Inactive/Fee Arb/B&P 6203 |
| 1 September 2001 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (23 years, 8 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
| 1 September 2001 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (23 years, 8 months ago) Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance |
| 14 July 1981 | Active (43 years, 10 months ago) |
| 6 July 1981 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (43 years, 10 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
| 16 December 1980 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (44 years, 4 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
October 13, 2006 MAUREEN ROCHELLE KALLINS [#95038], 58, of Vancouver, Wash. was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a 30-day actual suspension and until she makes restitution. If the actual suspension exceeds two years, she must prove her rehabilitation. The order took effect Oct. 13, 2006. Kallins stipulated that she failed to refund an unearned $2,500 fee to file a habeas corpus petition. She was retained by the grandmother of a convicted murderer to handle the appeal. The grandmother paid $12,500. Kallins informed her two years later that she needed an additional $3,000 to file a writ of habeas corpus. The client gave her $2,500. Alt-hough Kallins prepared and filed a writ in state court, she never filed a petition in federal court. An arbitrator awarded the grandmother $2,500 plus interest and, several years later, a superior court entered a judgment confirming the arbitration award of $3,365.Kallins also was disciplined in 2005.August 21, 2005 MAUREEN R. KALLINS [#95038], 57, of Vancouver, Wash. was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on three years of probation with an actual two-year suspension and was ordered to make restitution, prove her rehabilitation, take the MPRE and comply with rule 955. The order took effect Aug. 21, 2005. A high-profile criminal defense lawyer in the Bay Area, Kallins “repeatedly crossed the line from zealous advocacy to contemptuous disrespect in the courtroom,†wrote State Bar Court hearing Judge Joann Remke. After a six-day trial, she found that Kallins committed 14 acts of misconduct in nine matters and that she showed “no insight into her wrongdoing and demonstrated no remorse for her actions.†The judge said Kallins failed to perform legal services competently, communicate with clients or return unearned fees totaling $21,500, and she misled the court and repeatedly engaged in disruptive conduct in the courtroom.Four judges testified against Kallins during her trial. Three superior court judges had found her in contempt during trials in their courts as a result of disruptive conduct. One of the judges held Kallins in contempt five times and imposed sanctions totaling $4,300 during trial. All three judges said Kallins is the only lawyer they ever held in contempt in long tenures on the bench. The fourth judge presided over a federal criminal trial and ordered Kallins to produce a written fee agreement between her and her client. There was no agreement and Remke found that Kallins made repeated misrepresentations to the court about its existence.In all four matters, Remke found that Kallins failed to maintain respect for the courts. In the federal case, she also ruled that Kallins misled the court and committed acts of moral turpitude by repeatedly saying there was a written fee agreement when there was none.In five additional cases, Kallins did not return unearned fees.Remke said Kallins “has shown no insight into her wrongdoing and demonstrated no remorse for her actions. (She) fails to accept responsibility or appreciate the gravity of her misconduct. She knew what she was doing and intended to commit the acts.†|