Irvine, CA 92614
22 November 2001 | Disbarred (23 years, 5 months ago) Disbarment 01-N-00252 |
---|---|
28 May 2001 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (23 years, 11 months ago) Ordered inactive 01-N-00252 |
3 May 2001 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years ago) Ordered inactive 01-N-00252 |
2 March 2001 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 01-N-00252 (24 years, 2 months ago) |
14 September 2000 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years, 7 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 97-H-15862 |
5 September 1999 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (25 years, 8 months ago) Ordered inactive 97-H-15862 |
1 July 1999 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 97-H-15862 (25 years, 10 months ago) |
29 December 1996 | Private reproval, public disclosure 93-O-11714 (28 years, 4 months ago) |
30 November 1995 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 93-O-11714 (29 years, 5 months ago) |
10 November 1986 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 86-O-00134 (38 years, 6 months ago) |
16 December 1980 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (44 years, 4 months ago) |
November 22, 2001 MARK KENDALL WORCESTER [#94706], 46, of Irvine was disbarred Nov. 22, 2001, and was ordered to comply with rule 955. Worcester failed to comply with a 2000 disciplinary order that required him to comply with rule 955. He never filed the required affidavit.The underlying discipline was the result of Worcester’s failure to comply with conditions attached to a 1996 private reproval; he did not file four quarterly probation reports, complete ethics school or take the MPRE.His misconduct began with an agreement in lieu of discipline for failing to competently handle three civil matters and failing to communicate with a client. When he did not comply with conditions attached to the agreement, he was privately reproved.Worcester did not participate in the disbarment proceedings, and his default was entered.September 14, 2000 MARK KENDALL WORCESTER [#94706], 45, of Irvine was suspended for two years, stayed, actually suspended for 90 days and until he attends ethics school and the State Bar Court grants a motion to end the actual suspension, and he was ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 955. If the actual suspension exceeds two years, he must prove his rehabilitation. The order took effect Sept. 14, 2000. In a default hearing, the bar court found that Worcester failed to comply with conditions attached to a 1996 private reproval; he did not file four quarterly probation reports, complete ethics school or take the MPRE.His misconduct began with an agreement in lieu of discipline for failing to competently handle three civil matters and failing to communicate with a client. When he did not comply with conditions attached to the agreement, he was privately reproved. |