Mark Scott Roberts was first admitted to the California Bar 30th May 1980, but is now no longer eligible to practice. Mark graduated from Western State University.

Lawyer Information

NameMark Scott Roberts
First Admitted30 May 1980 (44 years, 11 months ago)
StatusNot Eligible to Practice
Bar Number92880

Contact

Current Email[email protected]
Phone Number949-566-5916

Schools

Law SchoolWestern State University (CA)
Undergraduate SchoolPepperdine University (Malibu CA)

Address

Current AddressRoberts Law Firm, PO Box 9769
Newport Beach, CA 92658
Map

History

12 September 2014Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 7 months ago)
Ordered inactive
1 July 2014Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 10 months ago)
Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance
2 July 2013Not eligible to practice law in CA (11 years, 10 months ago)
Suspended, failed to pay fees
22 October 2012Not eligible to practice law in CA (12 years, 6 months ago)
Suspended, failed to pass Prof.Resp.Exam 08-O-10426
31 August 2012Active (12 years, 8 months ago)
3 July 2012Not eligible to practice law in CA (12 years, 10 months ago)
Suspended, failed to pay fees
21 February 2012Active (13 years, 2 months ago)
21 August 2011Not eligible to practice law in CA (13 years, 8 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 08-O-10426
30 May 1980Admitted to the State Bar of California (44 years, 11 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

August 21, 2011

MARK SCOTT ROBERTS [#92880], 60, of Newport Beach was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a six-month actual suspension and he was ordered to take the MPRE within one year and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. The order took effect Aug. 21, 2011.

Roberts stipulated to eight counts of misconduct in three trust matters. In two of the matters, he failed to perform the services for which he was hired and his delayed responses to client inquiries forced the clients to hire new lawyers. He also did not account for client funds.

Roberts cancelled two meetings with a client who paid a $7,500 advance fee, and did not refund the unearned fee or give the client’s file to the new lawyer. A second client paid Roberts $8,500 before learning she had only to obtain her mother’s death certificate to transfer her mother’s assets into her name and Roberts’ services were unnecessary.

The third client, who paid a $10,000 advance fee, also loaned Roberts $25,000, although he asked for $40,000. He did not advise the client in writing to seek independent counsel about the loan. At the time of the stipulation, Roberts had repaid $1,062.

In mitigation, Roberts had no prior discipline record, cooperated with the bar’s investigation, was under severe financial stress due to a downturn in his business, family members had serious health problems and Roberts was going through a divorce after 27 years of marriage.