Santa Ana, CA 92703
3 July 2012 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (12 years, 10 months ago) Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance |
---|---|
16 August 2008 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (16 years, 8 months ago) Suspended/Child & Fam Supp noncompliance |
11 February 2008 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (17 years, 2 months ago) Suspended, failed to pass Prof.Resp.Exam 00-C-14169 |
14 September 2007 | Active (17 years, 7 months ago) |
14 September 2006 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (18 years, 7 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 00-C-14169 |
29 August 2003 | Active (21 years, 8 months ago) |
18 August 2003 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (21 years, 8 months ago) Suspended/Child & Fam Supp noncompliance |
31 October 2001 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 01-H-00963 (23 years, 6 months ago) |
1 August 2001 | Conviction record transmitted to State Bar Court 00-C-14169 (23 years, 9 months ago) |
14 September 2000 | Public reproval with/duties 99-C-12275 (24 years, 7 months ago) |
3 February 2000 | Conviction record transmitted to State Bar Court 99-C-12275 (25 years, 3 months ago) |
30 May 1980 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (44 years, 11 months ago) |
September 14, 2006 MONICA MARIE JIMENEZ [#92740], 53, of Santa Ana was suspended for three years, stayed, placed on five years of probation with a one-year actual suspension and was ordered to prove her rehabilitation, take the MPRE and comply with rule 955. The order took effect Sept. 14, 2006. In 2002, Jimenez stipulated to a 2000 conviction for misdemeanor public intoxication, which constituted a violation of probation conditions imposed in an earlier conviction, and a subsequent violation of her criminal probation. She also admitted her conduct involved moral turpitude.In a second case, Jimenez admitted she violated numerous probation conditions attached to a 2000 public reproval — she failed to submit four quarterly probation reports or complete ethics school and she violated her criminal probation.In 2002, Jimenez was accepted into the State Bar Court’s alternative discipline program for lawyers with substance abuse problems and enrolled in the Lawyer Assistance Program. Although she complied with the LAP requirements for more than two years, she was out of compliance by February 2005 and subsequently was terminated. Her efforts to re-enroll in the program were unsuccessful. Lawyers terminated from the LAP or the alternative discipline program are subject to a higher degree of discipline than would otherwise have been imposed. |