Charlotte, NC 28216-4510
9 January 1997 | Active (28 years, 4 months ago) |
---|---|
17 November 1996 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (28 years, 6 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 95-H-11751 |
15 October 1995 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (29 years, 7 months ago) Ordered inactive 95-H-11751 |
8 August 1995 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 95-H-11751 (29 years, 9 months ago) |
20 March 1994 | Public reproval with/duties 92-O-19662 (31 years, 2 months ago) |
23 December 1993 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 92-O-19662 (31 years, 5 months ago) |
27 December 1979 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (45 years, 5 months ago) |
November 17, 1996 THELMA BYERS BAILEY [#91236], 53, of Charlotte, N.C., was suspended for one year, stayed, and placed on probation for two years on the condition that she is actually suspended for 30 days and until she has submitted an office management plan to the bar's probation department. Should the period of actual suspension exceed two years, she will remain suspended until she has shown proof of her rehabilitation and fitness to practice law.Bailey also must provide proof that she did not practice law during the period of her actual suspension. In addition, she was ordered to attend the bar's ethics school, pass the MPRE and comply with rule 955 if she remains actually suspended for 90 days or more. The order took effect Nov. 17, 1996.Bailey's discipline order is the result of her failure to comply with conditions attached to a public reproval she received in 1994. She failed to meet the deadline for submission of an approved law office management plan to the bar's probation department and she did not supply proof of passage of the CPRE.The 1994 public reproval was considered a factor in aggravation, as was her failure to participate in the disciplinary proceedings prior to entry of default. |