Thelma Byers Bailey is an active member of the California Bar and was admitted 27th December 1979. Thelma graduated from St Louis University SOL.

Lawyer Information

NameThelma Byers Bailey
First Admitted27 December 1979 (44 years, 4 months ago)
StatusActive
Bar Number91236

Contact

Current Email[email protected]
Phone Number980-272-1943

Schools

Law SchoolSt Louis University SOL (St Louis MO)
Undergraduate SchoolEmory University (Atlanta GA)

Address

Current Address1816 Beatties Ford Rd
Charlotte, NC 28216-4510
Map

History

9 January 1997Active (27 years, 3 months ago)
17 November 1996Not eligible to practice law in CA (27 years, 5 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 95-H-11751
15 October 1995Not eligible to practice law in CA (28 years, 6 months ago)
Ordered inactive 95-H-11751
8 August 1995Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 95-H-11751 (28 years, 8 months ago)
20 March 1994Public reproval with/duties 92-O-19662 (30 years, 1 month ago)
23 December 1993Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 92-O-19662 (30 years, 4 months ago)
27 December 1979Admitted to the State Bar of California (44 years, 4 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

November 17, 1996

THELMA BYERS BAILEY [#91236], 53, of Charlotte, N.C., was suspended for one year, stayed, and placed on probation for two years on the condition that she is actually suspended for 30 days and until she has submitted an office management plan to the bar's probation department.

Should the period of actual suspension exceed two years, she will remain suspended until she has shown proof of her rehabilitation and fitness to practice law.

Bailey also must provide proof that she did not practice law during the period of her actual suspension. In addition, she was ordered to attend the bar's ethics school, pass the MPRE and comply with rule 955 if she remains actually suspended for 90 days or more. The order took effect Nov. 17, 1996.

Bailey's discipline order is the result of her failure to comply with conditions attached to a public reproval she received in 1994. She failed to meet the deadline for submission of an approved law office management plan to the bar's probation department and she did not supply proof of passage of the CPRE.

The 1994 public reproval was considered a factor in aggravation, as was her failure to participate in the disciplinary proceedings prior to entry of default.