Kailua Kona, HI 96740-1733
16 May 2003 | Disbarred (21 years, 11 months ago) Disbarment 02-N-11004 |
---|---|
1 November 2002 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years, 6 months ago) Ordered inactive 02-N-11004 |
29 August 2002 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years, 8 months ago) Ordered inactive 02-N-11004 |
18 April 2002 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 02-N-11004 (23 years ago) |
10 January 2002 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (23 years, 3 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 00-J-13587 |
23 March 2001 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years, 1 month ago) Ordered inactive 00-J-13587 |
18 January 2001 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 00-J-13587 (24 years, 3 months ago) |
27 September 1999 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (25 years, 7 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
1 January 1984 | Inactive (41 years, 4 months ago) |
29 November 1979 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (45 years, 5 months ago) |
May 16, 2003 NORMAN A. WESSEL [#88320], 50,, of Kailua Kona, Hawaii, was disbarred May 16, 2003, and was ordered to comply with rule 955 of the California Rules of Court. Wessel failed to comply with rule 955, as required by a 2001 disciplinary order. He did not submit to the California Supreme Court an affidavit stating that he notified his clients, opposing counsel and other interested parties that he had been suspended from practice.Failure to comply with rule 955 is grounds for disbarment.Wessel was disciplined for misconduct committed in Hawaii in connection with two clients. He was disciplined there for failing to perform legal services competently, communicate with clients, return unearned fees, provide an accounting or cooperate with the bar’s investigation and for improperly withdrawing from employment.January 10, 2002 NORMAN ALTER WESSEL [88320], 49, of Kailua, Kona, Hawaii was suspended for two years, stayed, actually suspended for six months and until the State Bar Court grants a motion to terminate the suspension, and was ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 955. If the actual suspension exceeds two years, he must prove his rehabilitation. The order took effect Jan. 10, 2002. Wessel was suspended for six months by the Supreme Court of Hawaii as the result of mishandling a foreclosure action. He never filed the complaint and did not return his client's or his client's new lawyer's phone calls. The State Bar Court determined that his acts in Hawaii would have constituted the following misconduct had they been committed in California: failure to perform legal services competently, respond to status inquiries or cooperate with a bar investigation and improperly withdrawing from employment. In a second matter, he represented a client in a suspended driver's license case, and requested a $250 retainer. When Wessel did not return several phone calls, the client consulted a new lawyer and requested a refund of the retainer. The California bar court found that Wessel's conduct, had it occurred in California, would have included failure to perform competently, respond to reasonable status inquiries, return unearned fees, provide an accounting and cooperate with a bar investigation. In mitigation, Wessel has no record of discipline in California. |