Carlos Miguel Alcala was first admitted to the California Bar 29th June 1979, but is now no longer eligible to practice. Carlos graduated from Harvard University Law School.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Carlos Miguel Alcala |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 29 June 1979 (44 years, 10 months ago) |
| Status | Not Eligible to Practice |
| Bar Number | 87094 |
Schools
| Law School | Harvard University Law School (Cambridge MA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | University of Texas (TX) |
Address
| Current Address | 335 Woodhaven Pl West Sacramento, CA 95605 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 1 September 2010 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (13 years, 8 months ago) Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance |
|---|---|
| 29 September 2000 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (23 years, 7 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 97-O-14367 |
| 2 August 1999 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 97-O-14367 (24 years, 9 months ago) |
| 12 September 1998 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (25 years, 8 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 96-O-02170 |
| 31 August 1998 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (25 years, 8 months ago) Suspended/Child & Fam Supp noncompliance |
| 31 July 1998 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (25 years, 9 months ago) Inactive - Irreparable injury (6007c) 98-TE-01876 |
| 21 April 1998 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 97-O-13176 (26 years ago) |
| 22 August 1997 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 96-O-02170 (26 years, 8 months ago) |
| 13 July 1996 | Public reproval with/duties 94-O-10216 (27 years, 10 months ago) |
| 26 March 1996 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 96-H-01260 (28 years, 1 month ago) |
| 19 April 1995 | Public reproval 91-O-00076 (29 years ago) |
| 9 February 1995 | Private reproval, public disclosure 93-O-18613 (29 years, 3 months ago) |
| 6 February 1995 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 94-O-10216 (29 years, 3 months ago) |
| 14 July 1994 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 91-O-00076 (29 years, 10 months ago) |
| 30 June 1994 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 93-O-18613 (29 years, 10 months ago) |
| 13 October 1992 | Active (31 years, 7 months ago) |
| 11 September 1992 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (31 years, 8 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 89-O-12729 |
| 20 November 1990 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 89-O-12729 (33 years, 5 months ago) |
| 29 June 1979 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (44 years, 10 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
September 29, 2000 CARLOS MIGUEL ALCALA [#87094], 52, of Sacramento was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on 18 months of probation with an actual 90-day suspension and was ordered to comply with rule 955. The order took effect Sept. 29, 2000. Alcala stipulated to misconduct in four consolidated matters.In the first, he entered into a confidential settlement agreement with a client who had complained about him to the State Bar. The client agreed that the terms of the settlement would not be reported to the bar, a violation of the Business & Professions Code.In the second matter, he filed a frivolous argument in an appeal, and referred to declarations or affidavits which had been excluded from evidence. His behavior constituted a failure to perform legal services competently.He filed a frivolous appeal in another case, and was sanctioned $2,250 for filing another lawsuit in the wrong venue. He neither paid the sanctions nor reported them to the State Bar.Alcala has been disciplined five times previously, including two public reprovals, one for failing to attend ethics school and the other for allowing an employee to sign a false declaration under penalty of perjury, and a private reproval for pursuing a moot appeal and an improper default and for frivolously opposing a motion to set aside the default.He also was suspended in 1992 and 1998. His misconduct in those two matters included failing to perform legal services competently, report court sanctions or abide by a court order, for signing and submitting an inaccurate declaration to the court. A lawsuit he filed was dismissed for failure to prosecute and he did not notify his clients of the dismissal. He then filed an appeal without authorization but did not properly prosecute the appeal.In mitigation, two clients said they were satisfied with Alcala’s work; the individual who originally complained about him withdrew the complaint. In the sanctions matter, he mistakenly believed he did not have to report the sanction until his appeal was exhausted.Alcala cooperated with the bar’s investigation, he has a history of pro bono work, and he submitted letters attesting to his good character. |