Lake Havasu City, AZ 86403
11 June 2005 | Disbarred (20 years ago) Disbarment 04-N-11790 |
---|---|
12 December 2004 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (20 years, 6 months ago) Ordered inactive 04-N-11790 |
22 August 2004 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (20 years, 10 months ago) Ordered inactive 04-N-11790 |
9 June 2004 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 04-N-11790 (21 years ago) |
4 March 2004 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (21 years, 3 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 02-O-10295 |
20 April 2003 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years, 2 months ago) Ordered inactive 02-O-10295 |
26 September 2002 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 02-O-10295 (22 years, 9 months ago) |
8 November 1988 | Active (36 years, 7 months ago) |
9 September 1988 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (36 years, 9 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension |
23 March 1987 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court (38 years, 3 months ago) |
23 June 1978 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (47 years ago) |
June 11, 2005 RONALD WILLIAM FITZGERALD [#80041], 55, of Diamond Bar was disbarred June 11, 2005, and was ordered to comply with rule 955. Fitzgerald did not comply with rule 955, as required by a 2004 disciplinary order, by failing to submit to the Supreme Court an affidavit stating that he notified his clients, opposing counsel and all pertinent parties of his suspension from practice. Failure to comply with rule 955 is grounds for disbarment.The underlying discipline was imposed because Fitzgerald practiced law while suspended for nonpayment of bar dues. He also committed an act of moral turpitude, disobeyed a court order and failed to cooperate with the bar’s investigation or keep his address up-do-date in bar records. He did not participate in the disbarment proceedings and his default was entered.March 4, 2004 RONALD WILLIAM FITZGERALD [#80041], 54, of Diamond Bar was suspended for two years, stayed, actually suspended for six months and until the State Bar Court grants a motion to terminate the suspension, and was ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 955. If the actual suspension exceeds two years, he must prove his rehabilitation. The order took effect March 4, 2004. In a default proceeding, the State Bar Court found that Fitzgerald practiced law while suspended. He was employed to handle a bankruptcy and filed a Chapter 7 petition on his clients’ behalf.The bankruptcy trustee filed a motion to determine whether the compensation Fitzgerald received was excessive and noted that, in addition to not being entitled to practice, Fitzgerald did not appear to have adequately provided services for preparing the petition. He court agreed Fitzgerald had charged and received an excessive fee and dismissed the bankruptcy petition. Fitzgerald did not refund the fee.The bar court also found that he committed an act of moral turpitude, disobeyed a court order and failed to cooperate with the bar’s investigation or keep his address up-do-date in bar records.Fitzgerald also was disciplined in 1983. |