Newport Beach, CA 92663
15 March 2001 | Disbarred (24 years, 3 months ago) Disbarment 00-N-10594 |
---|---|
16 September 2000 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years, 9 months ago) Ordered inactive 00-N-10594 |
24 June 2000 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years, 12 months ago) Ordered inactive 00-N-10594 |
20 April 2000 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 00-N-10594 (25 years, 2 months ago) |
22 March 2000 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (25 years, 3 months ago) Suspended, failed to pass Prof.Resp.Exam 96-O-08587 |
24 December 1998 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (26 years, 6 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 96-O-08587 |
31 January 1998 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (27 years, 4 months ago) Ordered inactive 97-O-10689 |
30 January 1998 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (27 years, 4 months ago) Ordered inactive 96-O-08587 |
8 January 1998 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (27 years, 5 months ago) Ordered inactive 97-O-14461 |
19 December 1997 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 97-O-10689 (27 years, 6 months ago) |
12 December 1997 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 96-O-08587 (27 years, 6 months ago) |
20 November 1997 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 97-O-14461 (27 years, 7 months ago) |
15 November 1997 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (27 years, 7 months ago) Ordered inactive 97-O-10577 |
26 September 1997 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 97-O-10577 (27 years, 9 months ago) |
23 June 1978 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (47 years ago) |
March 15, 2001 RICHARD CARL CAMINO [#79847], 54, of Newport Beach was disbarred March 15, 2001, and was ordered to comply with rule 955. Camino did not comply with a 1998 rule 955 order, requiring that he notify all clients and other pertinent parties of his suspension from practice and submit an affidavit to the Supreme Court attesting that he had done so. Failure to comply with rule 955 is grounds for disbarment.That discipline was imposed as a result of Camino’s failure to perform legal services competently, return client files, refund unearned fees, deposit client funds in a trust account, communicate with a client, or pay court-ordered sanctions, and he committed acts of moral turpitude.He defaulted in both matters. |