Phoenix, AZ 85022
23 February 2003 | Disbarred (22 years, 2 months ago) Disbarment 02-N-10695 |
---|---|
5 August 2002 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years, 9 months ago) Ordered inactive 02-N-10695 |
6 May 2002 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (23 years ago) Ordered inactive 02-N-10695 |
8 March 2002 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 02-N-10695 (23 years, 2 months ago) |
23 November 2001 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (23 years, 5 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 00-H-15024 |
8 April 2001 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years, 1 month ago) Ordered inactive 00-H-15024 |
30 January 2001 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 00-H-15024 (24 years, 3 months ago) |
16 February 2000 | Public reproval with/duties 99-J-10967 (25 years, 2 months ago) |
31 August 1999 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 99-J-10967 (25 years, 8 months ago) |
31 July 1995 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (29 years, 9 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
26 December 1989 | Inactive (35 years, 4 months ago) |
24 July 1989 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (35 years, 9 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
2 August 1988 | Inactive (36 years, 9 months ago) |
25 July 1988 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (36 years, 9 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
1 January 1979 | Inactive (46 years, 4 months ago) |
15 December 1977 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (47 years, 5 months ago) |
February 23, 2033 CHRISTOPHER COGLEY [#79263], 55, of Phoenix was disbarred Feb. 23, 2003, and was ordered to comply with rule 955. Cogley did not comply with rule 955, as required by a 2001 discipline order.That discipline was imposed because Cogley did not comply with conditions attached to a private reproval. The reproval was based on discipline imposed in Arizona.November 23, 2001 CHRISTOPHER COGLEY [#79263], 54, of Phoenix was suspended for one year, stayed, actually suspended for 90 days and until the State Bar Court grants a motion to terminate the suspension, and he was ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 955. If the actual suspension exceeds two years, he must prove his rehabilitation. The order took effect Nov. 23, 2001. Cogley failed to comply with probation conditions attached to a public reproval: he did not submit four probation reports.The reproval was issued as a result of having been disciplined in Arizona for failing to act with reasonable diligence in a client matter, not keeping the client informed and disobeying a court order.Cogley defaulted in the latest disciplinary proceeding. |