West Sacramento, CA 95691
22 April 2011 | Resigned (14 years, 1 month ago) Resignation with charges pending 10-Q-05327 |
---|---|
1 June 2010 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (15 years ago) Suspended, failed to pass Prof.Resp.Exam 07-O-13732 |
26 May 2010 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (15 years ago) Vol.inactive(tender of resign.w/charges) 10-Q-05327 |
13 November 2009 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (15 years, 7 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 09-N-10064 |
4 February 2009 | Active (16 years, 4 months ago) |
6 November 2008 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (16 years, 7 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 07-O-13732 |
21 December 1977 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (47 years, 6 months ago) |
November 13, 2009 ERNESTO J. PEREZ [#77729], 61, of West Sacramento was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a 150-day actual suspension and he must prove his rehabilitation and comply with rule 9.20. The order took effect Nov. 13, 2009. Perez did not comply with a 2008 disciplinary order that required him to meet the requirements of rule 9.20. He did not submit to the State Bar Court an affidavit stating that he notified his clients, opposing counsel and other pertinent parties of his suspension.In the underlying discipline, he stipulated that he misused his client trust account, commingling funds and using it to pay personal expenses.In mitigation, he cooperated with the bar’s investigation and no clients were harmed.November 6, 2008 ERNESTO PEREZ [#77729], 60, of West Sacramento was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on one year of probation with a 90-day actual suspension and was ordered to take the MPRE within one year and comply with rule 9.20. The order took effect Nov. 6, 2008. Perez stipulated that he improperly used his trust account over a six-month period.He deposited personal funds in his client trust account and issued checks against the account to pay personal obligations.In mitigation, no clients were harmed and he cooperated with the bar’s investigation. |