Paul Stanley Nash is an inactive member of the California Bar and was admitted 21st December 1977. Paul graduated from Arizona State University COL.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Paul Stanley Nash |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 21 December 1977 (47 years, 4 months ago) |
| Status | Inactive |
| Bar Number | 77555 |
| Sections | Business Law Trusts & Estates |
Contact
| Current Email | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Previous Email | [email protected] |
| Phone Number | 843-926-4064 |
| Fax Number | (949) 727-9040 |
Schools
| Law School | Arizona State University COL (Tempe AZ) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | California St Polytechnic University (Pomona CA) |
Address
| Current Address | Paul S Nash, 1501 Jacaranda Ct Mt Pleasant, SC 29466-8169 |
|---|---|
| Map | |
| Previous Address | Law Ofc Paul S Nash 16148 Sand Canyon Ave Irvine, CA 92618 |
| Previous Address | Law Ofc Paul S Nash, 5440 Trabuco Road Irvine, CA 92620-5783 |
| Previous Address | Law Ofc Paul S Nash, 32565 Golden Lantern Ste B PMB Dana Point, CA 92629 |
History
| 25 May 2023 | Inactive (1 year, 11 months ago) |
|---|---|
| 21 September 2016 | Active (8 years, 7 months ago) |
| 23 July 2016 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (8 years, 9 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 15-O-10030 |
| 21 December 1977 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (47 years, 4 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
July 23, 2016 PAUL STANLEY NASH [#77555], 67, of Irvine, was suspended from the practice of law for 60 days and ordered to take the MPRE. He was also placed on two years’ probation and faces a two-year suspension if he fails to comply with the terms of his disciplinary probation. The order took effect July 23, 2016. Nash failed to maintain a balance of $10,000 in his client trust account related to a business transaction he was helping negotiate and misappropriated $2,713.42. He also made six deposits of personal funds into his client trust account and made 44 payments for personal expenses from it.In aggravation, Nash committed multiple acts of misconduct, some of which was intentional. In mitigation, he had no prior record of discipline, there was no harm to his client, he made restitution and presented nine letters and declarations from the legal and public communities attesting to his good character. |