David Matthew McKim is an active member of the California Bar and was admitted 21st December 1977. David graduated from Santa Clara University SOL.
Lawyer Information
| Name | David Matthew McKim |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 21 December 1977 (47 years, 5 months ago) |
| Status | Active |
| Bar Number | 77396 |
Contact
| Phone Number | 650-918-8422 |
|---|---|
| Fax Number | 707-546-3274 |
Schools
| Law School | Santa Clara University SOL (Santa Clara CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | University of California Davis (Davis CA) |
Address
| Current Address | 212 Lenwood Dr Summerville, SC 29485-5724 |
|---|---|
| Map | |
| Previous Address | 425 S "E" St Ste B Santa Rosa, CA 95404 |
| Previous Address | 425 S "E" St Ste B Santa Rosa, CA 95404 |
History
| 10 December 2021 | Active (3 years, 5 months ago) |
|---|---|
| 19 July 2021 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (3 years, 10 months ago) Suspended, failed to pass Prof.Resp.Exam 16-C-17214 |
| 12 June 2020 | Active (4 years, 11 months ago) |
| 1 May 2020 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (5 years ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 16-C-17214 |
| 24 July 2017 | Conviction records transmitted to State Bar Court (7 years, 10 months ago) |
| 20 January 2015 | Active (10 years, 4 months ago) |
| 21 November 2014 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 6 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 12-O-11472 |
| 8 November 2013 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 12-O-11472 (11 years, 6 months ago) |
| 21 December 1977 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (47 years, 5 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
November 21, 2014 DAVID MATTHEW MCKIM [#77396], 62, of Santa Rosa, was suspended from the practice of law for 60 days and ordered to take the MPRE. He was also placed on two years’ probation and faces a one-year suspension if he does not comply with the terms of his disciplinary probation. The order took effect Nov. 21, 2014. The State Bar Court found McKim culpable of failing to avoid the representation of adverse interests and failing to obey a court order. McKim’s misconduct stems from his representation of two clients who later became business adversaries. One of the men sued the other man in four lawsuits over the course of four years. The court had repeatedly disqualified McKim from acting as opposing counsel to the plaintiff in the suit because of their past attorney-client relationship and his knowledge of client secrets relevant to the issues in the lawsuits. Undeterred, McKim continued to represent the defendant in those lawsuits between 2007 and 2012. In mitigation, McKim had no prior record of discipline and presented evidence of his good character. |