Orange, CA 92668-2069
16 August 1998 | Disbarred (26 years, 10 months ago) Disbarment 97-N-15860 |
---|---|
14 February 1998 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (27 years, 4 months ago) Ordered inactive 97-N-15860 |
8 December 1997 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (27 years, 6 months ago) Ordered inactive 97-N-15860 |
21 October 1997 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 97-N-15860 (27 years, 8 months ago) |
17 July 1997 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (27 years, 11 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 94-O-17986 |
11 January 1994 | Active (31 years, 5 months ago) |
12 December 1993 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (31 years, 6 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 92-H-16659 |
2 March 1993 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 92-H-16659 (32 years, 3 months ago) |
21 May 1992 | Public reproval with/duties 89-O-17751 (33 years, 1 month ago) |
26 July 1991 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 91-O-01921 (33 years, 11 months ago) |
1 April 1991 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 89-O-17751 (34 years, 2 months ago) |
28 June 1977 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (48 years ago) |
August 16, 1998 GUIDO ROY SMITH [#75055], 47, of Orange was disbarred Aug. 16, 1998, and was ordered to comply with rule 955. Smith failed to comply with an earlier rule 955 order, requiring him to notify his clients and all other interested parties of his suspension and submit an affidavit to that effect to the Supreme Court. Failure to comply with 955 is grounds for disbarment.That discipline was the result of an agreement between Smith and bar prosecutors in which Smith stipulated that he failed to perform legal services competently.He has been disciplined twice previously. In 1992, he was publicly reproved in two consolidated cases for failure to keep clients informed about the status of their case, communicate with clients, perform legal services competently, or cooperate with a bar investigation. He also withdrew from employment without protecting his client's interests.The following year, he was disciplined again and ordered to make restitution. His misconduct in that matter included failure to perform competently or refund unearned advanced fees, and improperly withdrawing from a case.In recommending Smith's disbarment, bar court Judge Madge S. Watai wrote, "[He] has demonstrated an unwillingness to comply with the professional obligations and rules of court imposed on California attorneys although he has been given the opportunity to do so."Watai said Smith's disbarment was necessary to protect the public, the courts and the legal community and to maintain high professional standards.July 17, 1997 GUIDO ROY SMITH [#75055], 46, of Orange was actually suspended for six months beginning July 17, 1997, and was ordered to comply with rule 955. Smith stipulated that he failed to perform legal services competently by failing to timely file a motion to set aside a default entered against his clients in November 1992 in Orange County Superior Court. The motion contained a declaration that he had suffered a nervous breakdown and lost his clients' file.In mitigation, Smith was undergoing radiation for treatment of leukemia at the time.He has a record of discipline, including a 1992 public reproval and a 1993 suspension and probation. |