Fresno, CA 93701
18 December 1998 | Disbarred (26 years, 4 months ago) Disbarment 98-N-01337 |
---|---|
8 June 1998 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (26 years, 11 months ago) Ordered inactive 98-N-01337 |
25 May 1998 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (26 years, 11 months ago) Ordered inactive 98-N-01337 |
15 April 1998 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 98-N-01337 (27 years ago) |
16 January 1998 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (27 years, 3 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 93-O-18913 |
14 May 1997 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (27 years, 11 months ago) Suspended/Child & Fam Supp noncompliance |
15 August 1996 | Active (28 years, 8 months ago) |
12 August 1996 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (28 years, 8 months ago) Suspended/Child & Fam Supp noncompliance |
1 June 1995 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 93-O-18913 (29 years, 11 months ago) |
15 March 1993 | Active (32 years, 1 month ago) |
12 February 1993 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (32 years, 2 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 89-O-10972 |
5 June 1990 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 89-O-10972 (34 years, 11 months ago) |
22 December 1976 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (48 years, 4 months ago) |
January 16, 1998 GEORGE NUNEZ [#72123], 53, of Fresno was suspended for four years, stayed, and placed on four years of probation with a one-year actual suspension and until he makes restitution. If the actual suspension exceeds two years, he must prove rehabilitation. He also was ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 955. The order took effect Jan. 16, 1998. Nunez stipulated to misconduct in three client matters.In the first, he negotiated a $25,000 settlement for his client in a sexual harassment case. When the client tried to cash the check Nunez issued, it was returned for insufficient funds. By not maintaining sufficient funds in his client trust account, Nunez misappropriated client funds.Hired by a couple to handle a civil matter, Nunez never responded to their telephone calls or pursued the matter, and his clients lost their cause of action. He failed to return their unearned fees and he withdrew from representation without protecting their interests.In a criminal case, Nunez accepted advance payment from the defendant’s mother. When the clients decided not to hire Nunez, he refused to refund any fees.Nunez has a prior record of discipline. |