Jeffrey Hans Leo was admitted to the California Bar 22nd December 1976, but has since been disbarred. Jeffrey graduated from Columbia University SOL.

Lawyer Information

NameJeffrey Hans Leo
First Admitted22 December 1976 (47 years, 4 months ago)
StatusDisbarred
Bar Number71640

Contact

Phone Number626-571-1239

Schools

Law SchoolColumbia University SOL (New York NY)
Undergraduate SchoolUniversity of North Dakota (Grand Forks ND)

Address

Current AddressAttorney at Law, 1300 Walnut St
San Gabriel, CA 91776
Map

History

8 December 2017Disbarred (6 years, 4 months ago)
Disbarment 15-O-16043
1 September 2017Not eligible to practice law in CA (6 years, 7 months ago)
Suspended, failed to pay fees
8 July 2017Not eligible to practice law in CA (6 years, 9 months ago)
Ordered inactive 15-O-16043
17 December 2016Not eligible to practice law in CA (7 years, 4 months ago)
Ordered inactive 15-O-16043
7 October 2016Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 15-O-16043 (7 years, 6 months ago)
1 July 2016Not eligible to practice law in CA (7 years, 10 months ago)
Suspended, failed to pay fees
31 October 2015Not eligible to practice law in CA (8 years, 5 months ago)
Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance
8 October 1997Discipline w/actual suspension; credit for prior ineligibility 91-C-07361 (26 years, 6 months ago)
8 October 1997Probation with conditions 91-C-07361 (26 years, 6 months ago)
23 May 1997Law Practice Restricted (26 years, 11 months ago)
31 May 1995Not eligible to practice law in CA (28 years, 11 months ago)
Ordered inactive
25 July 1994Not eligible to practice law in CA (29 years, 9 months ago)
Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance
22 December 1976Admitted to the State Bar of California (47 years, 4 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

October 8, 1997

JEFFREY HANS LEO [#71640], 46, of Los Angeles was suspended for four years and until he has provided proof of his fitness to practice. The suspension was stayed, and he was placed on four years of probation with a nine-month actual suspension, effective Oct. 8, 1997.

Credit for the period of actual suspension was given for the period of interim suspension from Sept. 16, 1994, to July 7, 1995. He was ordered to pass the MPRE.

Leo was caught in an undercover narcotics operation in September 1991 when he attempted to purchase six rocks of cocaine from a police officer posing as a drug dealer.

After pleading not guilty to a misdemeanor violation of Penal Code §653f(d), solicitation for consideration of a purchase of cocaine, diversion was granted in March 1992, but Leo was unable to complete the rehabilitation program within the required six months.

Leo was allowed additional time to complete the program, but again failed to do so and criminal proceedings were reinstated.

In February 1994, the court found him guilty and ordered him placed on summary probation for 24 months, to pay a fine of $810, to avoid illegal drugs and obey all laws.

In June 1994, his probation was revoked after the check he wrote to cover the $810 fine bounced. Leo was unaware there were insufficient funds in his account and his probation was reinstated in August, the fine deleted and he was ordered to serve 10 days in jail, with credit for five served.

In November 1996, the case was dismissed in the interests of justice.

In March 1993, Leo also was charged with three misdemeanor violations after he left a substance abuse program without permission and threatened a taxi driver with a pick-ax during an argument.

He re-entered the substance abuse program and was released from the hospital in June.

In January 1994, two of the charges were dismissed and he pleaded no contest to brandishing a weapon.

He was placed on summary probation for 36 months, sentenced to 30 days in county jail and ordered to spend 20 days cleaning up graffiti, make restitution of $175 to the victim, not possess dangerous weapons and attend AA meetings. He was allowed to perform community service in lieu of jail time.

In August 1996, after attending AA meetings and obtaining psychotherapeutic treatment, he was discharged from probation six months early and his case was ultimately dismissed.

It was stipulated that the facts and circumstances surrounding his arrests did not involve moral turpitude, but did involve other misconduct warranting discipline.

Leo also failed to file an affidavit of compliance with rule 955 after he was placed on interim suspension by the bar.

In aggravation, Leo’s misconduct involved multiple acts of wrongdoing. In addition, while on disciplinary probation and with criminal proceedings pending, Leo was arrested for possession of cocaine and placed in a diversion program.

However, the impact of his arrest as an aggravating circumstance was given limited consideration due to Leo’s rehabilitation efforts.

Because of the serious nature of Leo’s misconduct, his prior discipline-free record was not accorded any weight in mitigation.

However, in mitigation, Leo made significant steps in his rehabilitation and considerable time has passed since his misconduct.

In addition, he cooperated with the bar’s investigation and has not practiced law since July 1994.