Jay Nathan Eiser was admitted to the California Bar 25th May 1976, but is now resigned. Jay graduated from Southwestern University SOL.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Jay Nathan Eiser |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 25 May 1976 (48 years, 11 months ago) |
| Status | Resigned |
| Bar Number | 68860 |
Contact
| Phone Number | 562-435-7673 |
|---|
Schools
| Law School | Southwestern University SOL (Los Angeles CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | University of Southern Calif (Los Angeles CA) |
Address
| Current Address | P O Box 32942 Long Beach, CA 90832-2942 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 3 May 2007 | Resigned (18 years ago) Resignation with charges pending 07-Q-10567 |
|---|---|
| 9 February 2007 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (18 years, 2 months ago) Vol.inactive(tender of resign.w/charges) 07-Q-10567 |
| 16 September 2004 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (20 years, 7 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
| 16 September 2004 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (20 years, 7 months ago) Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance |
| 25 December 2003 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (21 years, 4 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 02-O-12102 |
| 6 February 2003 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 02-O-12102 (22 years, 3 months ago) |
| 7 November 2002 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 02-O-12497 (22 years, 6 months ago) |
| 27 September 2002 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 02-O-12498 (22 years, 7 months ago) |
| 7 February 2002 | Discipline, probation; no actual susp. 96-O-03364 (23 years, 2 months ago) |
| 25 May 1976 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (48 years, 11 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
December 25, 2003 JAY NATHAN EISER [#68860], 56, of Long Beach was suspended for four years, stayed, placed on five years of probation with an actual three-year suspension and was ordered to make restitution, prove his rehabilitation and comply with rule 955. The order took effect Dec. 25, 2003. Eiser stipulated to misconduct in five consolidated matters, all stemming from his work with Marc Padilla, a non-lawyer who told Eiser that another lawyer had abandoned her practice to him. Eiser gave Padilla the account information, check register and checks for his client trust account, even though Eiser was the only signatory. Padilla’s wife was responsible for the trust account and the couple did not allow Eiser to review the account records, although he claims he reviewed client settlement distribution worksheets. Padilla paid Eiser $3,000 a month.Eiser severed his relationship with Padilla after Padilla’s office was raided and he was questioned about allegations that he had raped a female client at gunpoint. Police allegedly located a firearm and illegal narcotics in the office.Padilla and his wife retained control of the trust account, although Eiser says he reviewed his records using an automated banking system. He closed the account after discovering that $15,000 had been deposited without his knowledge.In each of the cases, Eiser stipulated that he lent his name to be used by a non-lawyer, aided Padilla in the unauthorized practice of law and committed acts of moral turpitude. His law office did not pay medical providers, checks bounced, messages from clients and other lawyers were not answered, files were not returned and clients did not endorse checks that were cashed. Padilla threatened to take one client’s account to collection. In mitigation, Eiser had emotional or physical difficulties at the time of the misconduct.He was disciplined in 2002 for failing to maintain client funds in a trust account, commingling and committing acts of moral turpitude.February 7, 2002 JAY NATHAN EISER [68860], 55, of Long Beach was suspended for three years, stayed, placed on probation for three years and was ordered to take and pass the MPRE and attend the client trust accounting school. The order took effect Feb. 7, 2002. Eiser stipulated to his misconduct. Eiser received funds from three clients that he was to maintain in a trust account. He wrote several checks from the trust account, mostly to his wife, that were for personal expenses and not for payment of expenses incurred on behalf of his clients, and deposited his own funds into the trust account, evidencing the commingling of funds. Eiser also wrote several checks that were either returned to the bank where the trust account was held or paid against insufficient funds, indicating that he had engaged in acts involving moral turpitude.In mitigation, Eiser was under severe financial stress at the time of the misconduct. |