William Leo Reiser was admitted to the California Bar 13th January 1976, but is now resigned. William graduated from Santa Clara University SOL.

Lawyer Information

NameWilliam Leo Reiser
First Admitted13 January 1976 (49 years, 5 months ago)
StatusResigned
Bar Number67258

Contact

Phone Number925-938-2500

Schools

Law SchoolSanta Clara University SOL (Santa Clara CA)
Undergraduate SchoolGeorgetown University (Washington DC)

Address

Current Address1944 Tice Valley Blvd
Walnut Creek, CA 94595
Map

History

15 April 2004Resigned (21 years, 2 months ago)
Resignation with charges pending 04-Q-10531
18 February 2004Not eligible to practice law in CA (21 years, 4 months ago)
Vol.inactive(tender of resign.w/charges) 04-Q-10531
31 January 2004Not eligible to practice law in CA (21 years, 4 months ago)
Ordered inactive 03-N-04535
7 June 2003Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 00-O-14348
22 May 2002Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 00-O-14348 (23 years, 1 month ago)
13 January 1976Admitted to the State Bar of California (49 years, 5 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

June 7, 2003

WILLIAM LEO REISER [#67258], 54, of Walnut Creek was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on two years of probation with an actual 30-day suspension and until he makes restitution and was ordered to take the MPRE. If the actual suspension exceeds 90 days, he must comply with rule 955; if it exceeds two years, he must prove his rehabilitation. The order took effect June 7, 2003.

Reiser stipulated to misconduct in two cases.

Reiser was retained to dissolve a medical corporation for a physician who paid $1,175 in legal fees. He was to prepare and file about a half-dozen documents with the secretary of state and the appropriate governmental authorities. He never did so.

About 18 months later, the secretary of state suspended the corporation and six months after that, the Franchise Tax Board notified the doctor it had not received income tax returns for the previous year.

Reiser did not return the client's many phone calls, but the staff assured him the matter would be resolved. The doctor's accountant also got nowhere in his attempts to contact Reiser. On two occasions, the doctor was able to speak to Reiser, who assured him he would submit the necessary documentation.

He never did so, and the secretary of state suspended the corporate powers of the practice and the tax board sent the doctor of notice of suspension for failing to file tax returns.

Reiser stipulated that he failed to perform legal services competently. He also never refunded unearned fees, did not return the doctor's file and did not cooperate with the bar's investigation.

In a second case, he wrote 164 checks against his client trust account to pay personal expenses over a nine-month period.

In mitigation, Reiser has no record of discipline in 27 years of practice.