H Craig Holoboski was admitted to the California Bar 18th June 1974, but has since been disbarred. H graduated from Western State University.
Lawyer Information
| Name | H Craig Holoboski |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 18 June 1974 (49 years, 10 months ago) |
| Status | Disbarred |
| Bar Number | 59516 |
Contact
| Phone Number | 714-772-3377 |
|---|
Schools
| Law School | Western State University (CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | Stanford University (Stanford CA) |
Address
| Current Address | 2141 W La Palma Ave #D Anaheim, CA 92801 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 8 March 2003 | Disbarred (21 years, 1 month ago) Disbarment 02-N-11354 |
|---|---|
| 15 September 2002 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (21 years, 7 months ago) Ordered inactive 02-N-11354 |
| 4 July 2002 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (21 years, 10 months ago) Ordered inactive 02-N-11354 |
| 23 April 2002 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 02-N-11354 (22 years ago) |
| 23 November 2001 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years, 5 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 00-O-11892 |
| 1 September 2001 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years, 8 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
| 19 January 2001 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (23 years, 3 months ago) Ordered inactive 00-O-11892 |
| 26 October 2000 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 00-O-11892 (23 years, 6 months ago) |
| 18 June 1974 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (49 years, 10 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
March 8, 2003 H. CRAIG HOBOLOSKI [#59516], 58, of Anaheim was disbarred March 8, 2003, and ordered to comply with rule 955. Hoboloski did not comply with rule 955, as ordered in a 2001 discipline. That misconduct involved a single client for whom he failed to perform competently, communicate or refund unearned fees. He also did not cooperate with the bar's investigation.November 23, 2001 H. CRAIG HOLOBOSKI [#59516], 56, of Anaheim was suspended for one year, stayed, actually suspended for 60 days and until he makes restitution and the State Bar Court grants a motion to terminate the suspension, and he was ordered to take the MPRE. If the actual suspension exceeds 90 days, he must comply with rule 955; if it exceeds two years, he must prove his rehabilitation. The order took effect Nov. 23, 2001. In a default proceeding, the bar court found that Holoboski failed to perform legal services competently or communicate with a client, and he withdrew from representation without protecting his client’s interests.A client paid a $1,000 advance fee for Holoboski to represent him in a civil action against his business partners. The client wrote a letter to the partners and gave it to Holoboski for review before sending it to them. Holoboski did no other work on the case. He did not respond to three letters and 50 phone calls, nor did he refund unearned fees.In mitigation, he practiced for 24 years without any discipline. |