Marcello Mario DiMauro is an active member of the California Bar and was admitted 18th June 1974. Marcello graduated from UC Hastings COL.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Marcello Mario DiMauro |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 18 June 1974 (49 years, 11 months ago) |
| Status | Active |
| Bar Number | 59302 |
Contact
| Current Email | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Phone Number | (818) 265-0521 |
| Fax Number | (818) 242-8651 |
Schools
| Law School | UC Hastings COL (San Francisco CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | San Jose State University (San Jose CA) |
Address
| Current Address | 640 Solway St Glendale, CA 91206-1760 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 23 October 2000 | Active (23 years, 6 months ago) |
|---|---|
| 23 September 2000 | Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA (23 years, 7 months ago) |
| 19 August 1985 | Active (38 years, 8 months ago) |
| 5 August 1985 | Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA (38 years, 9 months ago) |
| 18 June 1974 | Admitted to The State Bar of California (49 years, 11 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
September 30, 2001 The previously ordered probation of MARCELLO MARIO DIMAURO [#59302], 56, of Glendale was extended for six months, effective Sept. 30, 2001. DiMauro was placed on probation in September 2000, but did not file a quarterly probation report or a report from a certified public accountant. The misconduct involved overdrafts from his client trust account; the insufficient funds were a result of poor bookkeeping and failing to wait the requisite period of time for deposited checks to clear. In three separate matters, 27 checks were written against insufficient funds.In mitigation, he had family problems at the time of the misconduct.September 23, 2000 MARCELLO MARIO DiMAURO [#59302], 55, of Glendale was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on one year of probation with an actual 30-day suspension, and was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect Sept. 23, 2000. The charges against DiMauro involved overdrafts from his client trust account; the insufficient funds were a result of poor bookkeeping and failing to wait the requisite period of time for deposited checks to clear.In three separate matters, 27 checks were written against insufficient funds.DiMauro stipulated that he failed to maintain client funds in a trust account.In mitigation, no clients were harmed, DiMauro cooperated with the bar’s investigation and he presented evidence of his good character. |