Steven Mark Klugman was admitted to the California Bar 14th December 1972, but has since been disbarred. Steven graduated from Northwestern University SOL.

Lawyer Information

NameSteven Mark Klugman
First Admitted14 December 1972 (52 years, 5 months ago)
StatusDisbarred
Bar Number53902

Contact

Current Email[email protected]
Phone Number310-214-1477
Fax Number310-214-1477

Schools

Law SchoolNorthwestern University SOL (Chicago IL)
Undergraduate SchoolUniversity of California at Los Angeles (CA)

Address

Current AddressSteven Mark Klugman, 3424 W Carson St Ste 500
Torrance, CA 90503-5723
Map

History

9 November 2019Disbarred (5 years, 6 months ago)
Disbarment 17-O-05345
21 June 2019Not eligible to practice law in CA (5 years, 11 months ago)
Ordered inactive 17-O-05345
10 September 2018Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 17-O-05345 (6 years, 8 months ago)
19 December 2017Active (7 years, 5 months ago)
19 June 2017Not eligible to practice law in CA (7 years, 11 months ago)
Actual Suspension Delayed 13-O-17015
9 June 2017Probation with conditions 13-O-17015 (7 years, 11 months ago)
27 August 2014Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 13-O-17015 (10 years, 9 months ago)
15 August 2014Active (10 years, 9 months ago)
12 July 2014Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 10 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 13-PM-14322
14 February 2011Active (14 years, 3 months ago)
14 October 2010Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 7 months ago)
Actual Suspension Delayed 03-O-05112
24 September 2010Probation with conditions 03-O-05112 (14 years, 8 months ago)
14 December 1972Admitted to the State Bar of California (52 years, 5 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

July 12, 2014

STEVEN MARK KLUGMAN [#53902], 67, of Manhattan Beach, was placed on three years’ probation with an actual 30-day suspension. The order took effect July 12, 2014.

Klugman’s probation was revoked because he did not comply with the terms of a 2010 disciplinary order. He did not file three reports with probation by the deadline, sent in required accounting certificates late on six occasions and failed to make restitution payments as ordered.

In mitigation, Klugman was experiencing health problems that led to his failure to comply with some of the conditions of his probation.

Klugman was previously suspended for 21 counts of misconduct in 12 matters, including six counts of moral turpitude.

September 24, 2010

STEVEN MARK KLUGMAN [#53902], 63, of Manhattan Beach was suspended for three years, stayed, placed on four years of probation with a four-month actual suspension and he was ordered to take the MPRE within one year and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. The order took effect Sept. 24, 2010, but the actual suspension began Oct. 14.

Klugman successfully completed the State Bar’s Alternative Discipline Program after establishing a connection between his misconduct and his mental health and substance abuse issues. He stipulated to 21 counts of misconduct in 12 matters, including six counts of moral turpitude.

For example, he failed to pursue a petition for asylum due to long absences from his office. He never met the client, who had hired Klugman’s office manager to handle the case and paid a $3,500 advance fee. Klugman also had a heart attack around the time an appeal brief was due.

Although he filed a civil complaint in a personal injury matter, the case was dismissed after Klugman missed two hearings, one on an order to show cause. The client was unable to reach Klugman, who closed his office, and hired a new lawyer, who had the dismissal set aside.

He received a $30,000 settlement check for another client, but allowed the balance in his trust account to fall below the required amount, and in another matter, he misappropriated $7,575 and said a private investigator’s bill was $2,373 when it was only $1,000.

In mitigation, Klugman had severe problems, beginning with his wife’ massive stroke that kept him out of the office for long periods of time, leading to serious emotional problems and finally substance abuse. He had no prior discipline record, cooperated with the bar’s investigation and had family problems at the time of the misconduct.