Douglas DeLange Graham was first admitted to the California Bar 26th June 1970, but is now no longer eligible to practice. Douglas graduated from University of Chicago Law School.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Douglas DeLange Graham |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 26 June 1970 (53 years, 10 months ago) |
| Status | Not Eligible to Practice |
| Bar Number | 46759 |
Contact
| Phone Number | 626-963-1101 |
|---|
Schools
| Law School | University of Chicago Law School (Chicago IL) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | University of Utah (Salt Lake City UT) |
Address
| Current Address | 600 N Bender Ave Glendora, CA 91741 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 1 September 2010 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (13 years, 8 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
|---|---|
| 7 February 2007 | Inactive (17 years, 2 months ago) |
| 1 August 2001 | Discipline, probation; no actual susp. 96-O-03729 (22 years, 9 months ago) |
| 26 June 1970 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (53 years, 10 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
August 1, 2001 DOUGLAS DELANGE GRAHAM, [#46759], 60, of Glendora was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on probation for two years and was ordered to take the MPRE. The order took effect Aug. 1, 2001. Graham stipulated to misconduct in three cases. In the first, he collected an illegal fee from a trust he administered. He collected both trustee and attorney fees, but was required by law to first notify the beneficiaries and to obtain court approval. From 1984 to 1996, he did not obtain any court orders regarding use of the trust funds, including the funds he paid to himself. He also did not give notice before collecting fees.Over the years, he paid himself more than $61,000. In 1996, he filed a final trust accounting, asking the court to award him $61,000 for work he did on the trust. Instead, the court found he was not entitled to all the fees he had already collected and ordered him to refund $50,000 to the beneficiaries.The other cases involved commingling funds: He used money drawn from his client trust account to cover personal expenses. Instead of withdrawing attorney’s fees from the trust account, he left the fees there to pay his personal expenses, writing at least 27 checks for that purpose.In aggravation, Graham’s actions showed a pattern of multiple acts of wrongdoing. In mitigation, he had no prior record of discipline, he cooperated with the bar’s investigation and acted in good faith. |