Lewis R Wiener was admitted to the California Bar 21st December 1967, but has since been disbarred. Lewis graduated from New York University SOL.

Lawyer Information

NameLewis R Wiener
First Admitted21 December 1967 (56 years, 4 months ago)
StatusDisbarred
Bar Number41186

Contact

Current Email[email protected]
Phone Number415-924-7800
Fax Number415-924-0204

Schools

Law SchoolNew York University SOL (New York NY)
Undergraduate SchoolUniversity of Vermont (Burlington VT)

Address

Current Address5710 Paradise Dr Ste 6
Corte Madera, CA 94925
Map

History

21 August 2010Disbarred (13 years, 8 months ago)
Disbarment 09-N-11261
20 March 2010Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 1 month ago)
Ordered inactive 09-N-11261
7 September 2008Not eligible to practice law in CA (15 years, 7 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 08-PM-11072
10 May 2008Not eligible to practice law in CA (15 years, 11 months ago)
Ordered inactive 08-PM-11072
24 October 2006Active (17 years, 6 months ago)
11 August 2006Not eligible to practice law in CA (17 years, 8 months ago)
Suspended, failed to pass Prof.Resp.Exam 03-O-02167
16 September 2005Active (18 years, 7 months ago)
18 June 2005Not eligible to practice law in CA (18 years, 10 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 03-O-02167
13 April 2004Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 03-O-02167 (20 years ago)
1 October 2000Active (23 years, 7 months ago)
17 August 2000Not eligible to practice law in CA (23 years, 8 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 99-O-12270
25 October 1999Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 99-O-12270 (24 years, 6 months ago)
17 February 1999Active (25 years, 2 months ago)
14 May 1998Not eligible to practice law in CA (25 years, 11 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 95-O-14361
25 October 1996Active (27 years, 6 months ago)
19 October 1996Not eligible to practice law in CA (27 years, 6 months ago)
Ordered inactive 95-O-14361
27 June 1996Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 95-O-14361 (27 years, 10 months ago)
22 June 1990Private reproval, public disclosure 88-0-15438 (33 years, 10 months ago)
20 December 1989Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 88-O-15438 (34 years, 4 months ago)
21 December 1967Admitted to the State Bar of California (56 years, 4 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

August 21, 2010

LEWIS R. WIENER [#41186], 69, of Corte Madera was disbarred Aug. 21, 2010, and was ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court.

Wiener failed to comply with a rule 9.20 requirement that was part of a 2008 probation revocation order. He filed a declaration stating that he notified his clients, opposing counsel and other interested parties of his suspension after the deadline. He also submitted two quarterly probation reports late.

Wiener has a record of five prior disciplines, beginning with a 1990 private reproval. According to a bar investigator, he held himself out to be an attorney in 2009 although he was suspended. In mitigation, Wiener’s wife was in the hospital and his mother was very sick at the time that the Office of Probation filed a motion to revoke probation that was later granted by the State Bar Court. Wiener himself was sick and was not able to file a quarterly probation report.

In recommending his disbarment, State Bar Court Judge Lucy Armendariz said Wiener “completely lacks credibility whenever he testified about not receiving correspondence from the State Bar.” Failure to comply with rule 9.20 is grounds for disbarment.

September 7, 2008

LEWIS R. WIENER [#41186], 67, of Corte Madera Probation was revoked, the stay of suspension was lifted and he was actually suspended for two years and until he proves his rehabilitation. He was placed on three years of probation and was ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 9.20. Credit will be given for a period of involuntary inactive enrollment that began May 10, 2008. The order took effect Sept. 7, 2008.

Wiener was suspended in 2005 but violated the terms of his probation by failing to file one quarterly probation report and submitting nine others late. He also submitted proof of only four of nine required hours of MCLE courses in ethics and law office management.

In the underlying matter, he was disciplined for failing to perform services competently, communicate with a client and cooperate with the bar’s investigation and he improperly withdrew from employment.

He was disciplined three additional times: in 1990, he was privately reproved for failing to perform legal services competently or communicate with a client and for violating his oath as an attorney; in 1998, he was suspended and placed on probation for failing to perform services competently, communicate with a client or cooperate with a bar investigation; and in 2000 he was again suspended and placed on probation for violating the terms of his probation, practicing while suspended and for failing to complete ethics school.

June 18, 2005

LEWIS R. WIENER [#41186], 64, of Corte Madera was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on three years of probation with a 90-day actual suspension and was ordered to prove his rehabilitation, take the MPRE and comply with rule 955. The order took effect June 18, 2005.

Wiener prepared the tax returns for a married couple from the late 1970s to 2001. He also joined the couple and four other people in purchasing property that was held by the Shoreline Trust. Wiener served as trustee.

In 2000, the couple asked Wiener to liquidate their interest in the trust; he did so and sent them a substantial amount of money but did not provide an accounting, despite their numerous requests.

In 2001, he failed to prepare the couple’s tax returns. On April 15, 2002, he advised the couple to seek extensions for the year 2001 and promised to prepare the tax returns. Although the couple called him frequently, he never prepared their tax returns or provided old documents.

Wiener stipulated that he failed to perform legal services competently, return client documents, respond to client inquiries, render accounts or cooperate with the bar’s investigation and he improperly withdrew from employment.

He has been disciplined three times previously with a 1990 private reproval, a suspension in 1998 for failing to provide competent legal services, communicate with a client or cooperate with a bar investigation, and a suspension in 2000 for violating the terms of his probation.

August 17, 2000

LEWIS R. WIENER [#41186], 59, of Corte Madera was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a 45-day actual suspension, and was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect Aug. 17, 2000.

Wiener stipulated that he failed to comply with the conditions attached to a 1998 discipline order: he did not submit quarterly probation reports, attend ethics school, or stop practicing law during an actual 30-day suspension.

Wiener said he did not receive and was unaware of the disciplinary order although it was properly mailed and there is a presumption that he received it. He acknowledged that his failure to comply with probation conditions is considered legally wilful even though he was not actually aware of the order.

The 1998 discipline was the result of failing to perform legal services competently, respond to a client’s inquiries or cooperate with the bar’s investigation.

He also was privately reproved in 1990 for failure to perform competently or communicate with clients.

In mitigation, he cooperated with the bar’s investigated and acted in good faith.

May 14, 1998

LEWIS R. WEINER [#41186], 57, of Corte Madera was suspended for one year, stayed, and placed on probation for 18 months on the condition that he is actually suspended for 30 days, effective May 14, 1998. He was ordered to pass the MPRE.

In a single probate matter which occurred over a two-year period, Weiner failed to appear at a status conference and file a timely final accounting and petition for distribution of the estate.

He recklessly failed to perform competent legal services and adequately communicate with his client.

Considered an aggravating circumstance was Weiner's prior record of discipline, a 1990 private reproval. In addition, he failed to participate in disciplinary proceedings.

Weiner was given limited credit for not causing his client any lasting harm.

In an opinion on review, a State Bar Court review judge disagreed with the hearing department's recommendation that Weiner not be required to make quarterly probation reports. The review judge ordered a quarterly reporting condition. “In this case involving attorney-client misconduct with a recent prior reproval . . . the appropriateness of a quarterly reporting condition of probation is clear.”