Thomas Orlando Hurst IV is an inactive member of the California Bar and was admitted 11th January 1966. Thomas graduated from UC Berkeley SOL.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Thomas Orlando Hurst IV |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 11 January 1966 (58 years, 4 months ago) |
| Status | Inactive |
| Bar Number | 37525 |
Schools
| Law School | UC Berkeley SOL (Berkeley CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | San Jose State University (San Jose CA) |
Address
| Current Address | 219 Watson Dr Apt 1 Campbell, CA 95008 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 27 June 2012 | Inactive (11 years, 10 months ago) |
|---|---|
| 27 April 2012 | Active (12 years ago) |
| 31 January 2012 | Inactive (12 years, 3 months ago) |
| 21 January 2011 | Active (13 years, 3 months ago) |
| 1 January 2003 | Inactive (21 years, 4 months ago) |
| 3 March 2002 | Discipline, probation; no actual susp. 00-PM-14514 (22 years, 2 months ago) |
| 29 August 2001 | Active (22 years, 8 months ago) |
| 9 July 2001 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years, 9 months ago) Suspended, failed to pass Prof.Resp.Exam 96-O-08567 |
| 28 June 2001 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years, 10 months ago) Ordered inactive 00-PM-14514 |
| 7 April 2000 | Discipline, probation; no actual susp. 96-O-08567 (24 years ago) |
| 9 March 1998 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 96-O-08567 (26 years, 1 month ago) |
| 11 January 1966 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (58 years, 4 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
April 7, 2000 THOMAS ORLANDO HURST IV [#37525], 65, of San Jose was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on two years of probation, and was ordered to make restitution and take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect April 7, 2000. Hurst stipulated to misconduct in his handling of two dissolution cases.His client paid $5,250 in advanced fees in the first matter, and Hurst filed a petition for dissolution and prepared and sent some financial disclosure papers his client’s husband had requested.Several months later, his client decided to file for bankruptcy and asked Hurst to draft the marital settlement agreement quickly in order that she could file bankruptcy papers. He did not do so, nor did he return her phone calls, provide an accounting of the advance fees or return the unearned fee.A second client paid Hurst $2,500 in advance to handle her divorce, but he did not return numerous phone calls, and at one point told her he’d received an extension to respond to a petition. When the client hired a new lawyer, Hurst did not respond to her letter seeking a refund of fees, nor did he repay the unearned fees.In mitigation, Hurst has no prior record of discipline, he presented testimony about his good character, and he was under the wrong impression that the bankruptcy attorney would finalize his first client’s marital settlement agreement. |