Edwin Tolmas is an active member of the California Bar and was admitted 9th June 1964. Edwin graduated from Southwestern University SOL.

Lawyer Information

NameEdwin Tolmas
First Admitted9 June 1964 (60 years, 11 months ago)
StatusActive
Bar Number35726

Contact

Current Email[email protected]
Phone Number818-601-5297
Fax Number818-360-8357

Schools

Law SchoolSouthwestern University SOL (Los Angeles CA)
Undergraduate SchoolUniversity of California at Los Angeles (CA)

Address

Current AddressPO Box 8234
Northridge, CA 91327
Map

History

9 December 2013Active (11 years, 4 months ago)
26 November 2012Not eligible to practice law in CA (12 years, 5 months ago)
Suspended, failed to pass Prof.Resp.Exam 06-O-10022
29 December 2010Active (14 years, 4 months ago)
12 November 2010Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 5 months ago)
Actual Suspension Delayed 06-O-13474
24 September 2010Probation with conditions 06-O-13474 (14 years, 7 months ago)
11 July 2009Active (15 years, 9 months ago)
11 June 2009Not eligible to practice law in CA (15 years, 10 months ago)
Ordered inactive 06-O-13474
21 October 2005Public reproval with/duties 04-O-14950 (19 years, 6 months ago)
11 October 2005Active (19 years, 6 months ago)
16 September 2005Not eligible to practice law in CA (19 years, 7 months ago)
Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance
24 May 2005Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 04-O-14950 (19 years, 11 months ago)
31 July 1993Discipline, probation; no actual susp. 89-O-16271 (31 years, 9 months ago)
29 August 1991Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 89-O-16271 (33 years, 8 months ago)
9 June 1964Admitted to the State Bar of California (60 years, 11 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

September 24, 2010

EDWIN TOLMAS [#35726], 74, of Los Angeles was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on three years of probation with an actual 75-day suspension and he was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect Sept. 24, 2010.

Tolmas successfully completed the Alternative Discipline Program, after stipulating to misconduct in three cases: he failed to perform competently, communicate, promptly return client files and unearned fees, and he appeared without a client’s authorization. He also violated probation conditions attached to a 2005 public reproval by failing to file quarterly reports on time, make restitution, attend Ethics School or contact the probation office. He was accepted in the ADP after demonstrating a connection between his misconduct and his mental health and substance abuse problems.