William Douglas Weigand Jr was first admitted to the California Bar 9th January 1957, but is now no longer eligible to practice. William graduated from USC Law School.

Lawyer Information

NameWilliam Douglas Weigand Jr
First Admitted9 January 1957 (68 years, 4 months ago)
StatusNot Eligible to Practice
Bar Number27613

Contact

Phone Number661-250-3939
Fax Number818-361-6850

Schools

Law SchoolUSC Law School (Los Angeles CA)
Undergraduate SchoolUniversity of California at Los Angeles (CA)

Address

Current AddressPO Box 752
San Fernando, CA 91341
Map

History

2 July 2013Not eligible to practice law in CA (11 years, 10 months ago)
Suspended, failed to pay fees
1 July 2011Not eligible to practice law in CA (13 years, 10 months ago)
Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance
19 October 1998Active (26 years, 6 months ago)
16 August 1998Not eligible to practice law in CA (26 years, 8 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 96-O-01476
23 September 1997Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 96-O-01426 (27 years, 7 months ago)
26 February 1996Public reproval with/duties 94-O-16101 (29 years, 2 months ago)
12 July 1995Not eligible to practice law in CA (29 years, 10 months ago)
Ordered inactive 94-0-16101
24 April 1995Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 94-O-16101 (30 years ago)
9 January 1957Admitted to the State Bar of California (68 years, 4 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

August 16, 1998

WILLIAM DOUGLAS WEIGAND JR. [#27613], 71, of San Fernando was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on one year of probation with a 60-day actual suspension and was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect Aug. 16, 1998.

Weigand was placed on inactive status for seven months in 1995-96 for failing to file a written response to a notice to show cause in a bar discipline case.

During that time, he made 19 court appearances although he was not entitled to do so.

In mitigation, Weigand did not review the notice of his inactive status and did not knowingly engage in the unlawful practice of law. He did not harm any clients and cooperated with the bar's investigation.

He has a prior record of discipline: he received a public reproval in 1996 for failure to perform legal services competently.