Nia Lloyd Hildreth is an active member of the California Bar and was admitted 18th May 2009. Nia graduated from Santa Clara University SOL.

Lawyer Information

NameNia Lloyd Hildreth
Former NameNia Lloyd Woolliscroft
First Admitted18 May 2009 (14 years, 11 months ago)
StatusActive
Bar Number262916

Contact

Current Email[email protected]
Phone Number615-259-2511

Schools

Law SchoolSanta Clara University SOL (Santa Clara CA)
Undergraduate SchoolColl of Notre Dame (Belmont CA)

Address

Current AddressPolsinelli LLC (PC in California), 401 Commerce St, Ste 900
Nashville, TN 37219-2538
Map
Previous Address4 Cabernet Ct
Scotts Valley, CA 95066
Previous Address130 Zinfandel Cir
Scotts Valley, CA 95066-3256
Previous Address1042 Dovecrest Way
Franklin, TN 37067-1595

History

24 August 2022Active (1 year, 8 months ago)
1 February 2019Inactive (5 years, 2 months ago)
3 January 2015Active (9 years, 3 months ago)
3 July 2014Not eligible to practice law in CA (9 years, 9 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 12-O-10057
18 May 2009Admitted to the State Bar of California (14 years, 11 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

July 3, 2014

NIA LLOYD WOOLLISCROFT [#262916], 31, of Campbell, was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on three years’ probation with a six-month actual suspension and ordered to take the MPRE, comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court and make restitution. The order took effect July 3, 2014.

Woolliscroft stipulated that she represented 78 clients through US Loan Auditors LLC, US Loan Auditors Inc. and My US Legal Services, companies owned in part by non-attorneys, and accepted impermissible fees from each client. From March 2010 to September 2010, Woolliscroft worked as a contract attorney handling predatory lender lawsuits on behalf of the homeowners. During that time period, USLS paid her $88,250 from a portion of the monthly installments paid to USLS as advanced attorney’s fees. The $88,250 represented an impermissible fee split with a non-attorney. As of the January 2014 stipulation, she had not repaid any of the fees.

In addition, Woolliscroft failed to provide a client with monthly billing statements pursuant to her fee agreement or provide an accounting of fees and costs. She was ordered to pay $88,250 plus interest in restitution.

In mitigation, Woolliscroft entered into a prefiling stipulation with the State Bar.