Demas W Yan was admitted to the California Bar 1st December 2008, but has since been disbarred. Demas graduated from Northwestern California U.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Demas W Yan |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 1 December 2008 (16 years, 6 months ago) |
| Status | Disbarred |
| Bar Number | 257854 |
| Sections | Law Practice Mgmt |
Contact
| Current Email | anewlaw@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Phone Number | 415-867-5797 |
Schools
| Law School | Northwestern California U (Sacramento CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | San Jose State University (San Jose CA) |
Address
| Current Address | 100 Pine St Ste 1250 San Francisco, CA 94111-5235 |
|---|---|
| Map | |
| Previous Address | 300 Frank H Ogawa Plz Ste 218 Oakland, CA 94612 |
History
| 16 March 2018 | Disbarred (7 years, 2 months ago) Disbarment 13-O-17331 |
|---|---|
| 30 September 2017 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (7 years, 8 months ago) Ordered inactive 13-O-17331 |
| 10 January 2017 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 16-J-17889 (8 years, 4 months ago) |
| 2 November 2016 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 15-O-13359 (8 years, 7 months ago) |
| 11 October 2016 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 14-O-05531 (8 years, 7 months ago) |
| 11 October 2014 | Active (10 years, 7 months ago) |
| 11 October 2013 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (11 years, 7 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 09-O-12085 |
| 15 November 2011 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 09-O-12085 (13 years, 6 months ago) |
| 1 December 2008 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (16 years, 6 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
October 11, 2013 DEMAS W. YAN [#257854], 49, of San Francisco, was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on three years’ probation with an actual one-year suspension and ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. The order took effect Oct. 11, 2013. In March 2012, Yan stipulated to misconduct in one client matter: misuse of his client trust account and receiving unemployment benefits to which he was not entitled for one month. The following August, the California Supreme Court returned the matter to the State Bar for further consideration as to the appropriate level of discipline.In concluding that his misconduct warranted a one-year actual suspension, the State Bar Court found that Yan committed misconduct by not depositing $2,000 in advanced costs in his client trust account and misappropriating the $2,000. He also failed to avoid representation of adverse interests because he represented a client in one matter while suing him in another. He did not inform the client of the conflict or obtain his written consent.In addition, Yan deposited his own funds in his IOLTA account for his own use and benefit to pay his bills and claimed unemployment benefits to which he was not entitled.In mitigation, Yan was young and inexperienced at the time of his misconduct, cooperated with the State Bar by entering into a stipulation and showed remorse for his wrongdoing. |