Jessany Emileigh Garrett is an active member of the California Bar and was admitted 16th March 2006. Jessany graduated from UCLA SOL.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Jessany Emileigh Garrett |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 16 March 2006 (19 years, 2 months ago) |
| Status | Active |
| Bar Number | 241893 |
Contact
| Current Email | [email protected] |
|---|
Schools
| Law School | UCLA SOL (Los Angeles CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | Hampton Univ. (Hampton VA) |
Address
| Current Address | Plummer Law Group PC, 16255 Ventura Blvd, Ste 625 Encino, CA 91436-2307 |
|---|---|
| Map | |
| Previous Address | 829 W Palmdale Blvd # 18 Palmdale, CA 93551-4261 |
History
| 13 September 2013 | Discipline, probation; no actual susp. 11-C-13161 (11 years, 9 months ago) |
|---|---|
| 14 November 2012 | Active (12 years, 6 months ago) |
| 22 July 2012 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (12 years, 10 months ago) Interim suspension after conviction 11-C-13161 |
| 7 June 2012 | Conviction record transmitted to State Bar Court 11-C-13161 (13 years ago) |
| 16 March 2006 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (19 years, 2 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
September 13, 2013 JESSANY EMILEIGH GARRETT [#241893], 59, of Newhall, was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on two years' probation and ordered to take the MPRE. The order took effect Sept. 13, 2013. Garrett stipulated to the facts surrounding her August 2012 misdemeanor conviction for making criminal threats. Garrett was arrested after she pulled a gun on and threatened a man she discovered was in her driveway after hearing her car alarm triggered. The man did not immediately identify himself, but it turned out he worked for a repossession company and had come to seize her car.In mitigation, Garrett admitted culpability and entered into a pre-trial stipulation.July 22, 2012 JESSANY EMILEIGH GARRETT, 32, of Sherman Oaks was placed on interim suspension July 22, 2012, after she was convicted of making criminal threats, a felony that does not involve moral turpitude. She was ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. |