Oscar Acevedo is an active member of the California Bar and was admitted 22nd July 2005. Oscar graduated from UC Hastings COL.

Lawyer Information

NameOscar Acevedo
First Admitted22 July 2005 (19 years, 9 months ago)
StatusActive
Bar Number237530
SectionsCriminal Law

Contact

Current Email[email protected]
Phone Number213-290-1422
Fax Number213-986-3019

Schools

Law SchoolUC Hastings COL (San Francisco CA)
Undergraduate SchoolCalifornia St University Long Beach (CA)

Address

Current AddressLaw Office of Oscar Acevedo, 714 W Olympic Blvd Ste 621
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1438
Map
Previous Address714 W Olympic Blvd Ste 621
Los Angeles, CA 90015

History

15 October 2012Active (12 years, 6 months ago)
16 June 2012Not eligible to practice law in CA (12 years, 10 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 11-J-10293
22 July 2005Admitted to the State Bar of California (19 years, 9 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

June 16, 2012

OSCAR ACEVEDO, 36, of Los Angeles was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on two years of probation with an actual 120-day suspension and he was ordered to take the MPRE. The order took effect June 16, 2012.

Acevedo was suspended by the bankruptcy court for one year after he filed 19 cases for the improper purpose of delaying foreclosures and without any intent to proceed with the bankruptcies. He did not disclose that another entity, rather than the 19 clients, paid Acevedo $799 for each petition. The fees were paid by Shoemaker Entities, a group of companies created to perform “econometric analysis” for mortgage loans. One of the companies was a law firm specializing in lender liability issues and foreclosure litigation.

Acevedo stipulated that he failed to perform legal services competently or promptly refund unearned fees, and he pursued unjust actions and sought to mislead the court. He paid court-ordered sanctions of $9,500 and paid the U.S. Trustee the $799 fee for each client.

Acevedo had no prior discipline record, presented evidence of his good character and cooperated with the bar’s investigation. He took responsibility for his actions and took several steps to compensate for his misconduct prior to the bankruptcy court’s imposition of discipline.