Michael Alan Giulianti was admitted to the California Bar 1st June 2005, but has since been disbarred. Michael graduated from Southwestern University SOL.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Michael Alan Giulianti |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 1 June 2005 (18 years, 11 months ago) |
| Status | Disbarred |
| Bar Number | 237078 |
Contact
| Current Email | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Phone Number | 954-558-7830 |
Schools
| Law School | Southwestern University SOL (Los Angeles CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | University of Florida (Gainesville FL) |
Address
| Current Address | 8147 N Savannah Cir Davie, FL 33328 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 14 March 2008 | Disbarred (16 years, 1 month ago) Disbarment 06-C-13229 |
|---|---|
| 16 August 2007 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (16 years, 8 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
| 16 August 2007 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (16 years, 8 months ago) Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance |
| 29 June 2007 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (16 years, 10 months ago) Interim suspension after conviction 06-C-13229 |
| 2 March 2007 | Conviction record transmitted to State Bar Court 06-C-13229 (17 years, 2 months ago) |
| 8 February 2007 | Conviction record transmitted to State Bar Court 06-C-13228 (17 years, 2 months ago) |
| 19 December 2006 | Public reproval with/duties 06-O-11175 (17 years, 4 months ago) |
| 1 June 2005 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (18 years, 11 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
March 14, 2008 MICHAEL ALAN GIULIANTI [#237078], 37, of Hollywood, Fla. was summarily disbarred March 14, 2008, and was ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. In 2006, Giulianti pleaded no contest to “uttering a forged instrument†(passing a counterfeit note) in Florida, a third-degree felony. When the State Bar recommended his summary disbarment, Giulianti argued that the crime was a wobbler that could have been charged as a misdemeanor in California and he said the conviction was not final because the sentence was suspended.The State Bar Court review department rejected both claims and noted that the time for appeal has expired.Because the offense is a felony that involves moral turpitude, it meets the requirements for summary disbarment. |