Eden Beloved Noe was admitted to the California Bar 23rd May 2005, but has since been disbarred. Eden graduated from University of Maryland SOL.

Lawyer Information

NameEden Beloved Noe
First Admitted23 May 2005 (18 years, 11 months ago)
StatusDisbarred
Bar Number236172

Contact

Current Email[email protected]
Phone Number310-650-1595
Fax Number323-582-8085

Schools

Law SchoolUniversity of Maryland SOL (Baltimore MD)
Undergraduate SchoolUniversity of California Davis (Davis CA)

Address

Current AddressEden Noe, 5854 Kiyot Way
Playa Vista, CA 90094
Map

History

23 March 2013Disbarred (11 years, 1 month ago)
Disbarment 12-C-11123
3 July 2012Not eligible to practice law in CA (11 years, 10 months ago)
Suspended, failed to pay fees
6 May 2012Not eligible to practice law in CA (11 years, 12 months ago)
Interim suspension after conviction 12-C-11123
14 March 2012Conviction record transmitted to State Bar Court 12-C-11123 (12 years, 1 month ago)
14 May 2011Not eligible to practice law in CA (12 years, 11 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 08-O-12146
23 May 2005Admitted to the State Bar of California (18 years, 11 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

March 23, 2013

EDEN BELOVED NOE [#236172], 34, of Playa Vista, was summarily disbarred March 23, 2013, and was ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court.

Noe was convicted of forgery in 2012. Because the crime is a felony involving moral turpitude it meets the criteria for summary disbarment.

May 6, 2012

EDEN BELOVED NOE [#236172], 33, of Playa Vista was placed on interim suspension May 6, 2012, after she was convicted of forgery, a felony involving moral turpitude. She was ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court.

May 14, 2011

EDEN BELOVED NOE [#236172], 32, of Playa Vista was suspended for four years, stayed, placed on four years of probation with a 30-month actual suspension and until she proves her rehabilitation and she was ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. The order took effect May 14, 2011.

Noe stipulated to six counts of misconduct in two matters.

In the first, she filed a false declaration, sought to mislead a judge and participated in a scheme to transfer title of a disputed property to avoid a court order. She had represented her mother in a property sale dispute, but substituted out, designating her mother in pro per. Nonetheless, Noe continued to give legal advice to her mother, who was the defendant. She was sanctioned for allegedly advising her mother to transfer the property to Coochie, LLP, an entity controlled by her mother, although the court had ordered that the property go to the plaintiffs.

In a statement given to the court under penalty of perjury, Noe said she knew nothing about Coochie and was not her mother’s “personal secretary, employee or attorney.” The court found that her statement was a misrepresentation made to “cover up (her) involvement in the scheme to avoid the court-ordered conveyance of the disputed property to the plaintiffs.” She was sanctioned $2,000 and did not report the sanction to the State Bar.

In a later declaration to the court, Noe falsely claimed an ownership interest in the property.

In a second matter, she filed a lawsuit and an amended complaint but did not respond to the other side’s cross-complaint. She did no further work, failed to appear at six hearings and a default judgment was entered against her client for $17, 332 plus $2,841 in interest and costs. She did not notify the client, who hired a new lawyer to vacate the judgment.

Noe provided a declaration, including confidential information, to opposing counsel that was used to defeat the motion to vacate. She later asked the other lawyer not to file the declaration.

She stipulated that she failed to provide legal services competently or maintain client confidentiality.

In mitigation, Noe cooperated with the bar’s investigation.