Natalie Dor-Dor Wang was first admitted to the California Bar 1st June 2004, but is now no longer eligible to practice. Natalie graduated from USC Law School.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Natalie Dor-Dor Wang |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 1 June 2004 (19 years, 11 months ago) |
| Status | Not Eligible to Practice |
| Bar Number | 231122 |
Contact
| Current Email | [email protected] |
|---|
Schools
| Law School | USC Law School (Los Angeles CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | University of California at Los Angeles (CA) |
Address
| Current Address | 252 Caruso Ave Glendale, CA 91210 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 1 November 2014 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (9 years, 6 months ago) Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance |
|---|---|
| 1 July 2014 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (9 years, 10 months ago) Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance |
| 23 August 2013 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 8 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 10-O-09334 |
| 2 September 2011 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 10-O-09334 (12 years, 8 months ago) |
| 19 August 2011 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 10-O-10607 (12 years, 8 months ago) |
| 1 June 2004 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (19 years, 11 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
August 23, 2013 NATALIE DOR-DOR WANG [#231122], 34, of Glendale, was suspended for three years, stayed, placed on three years’ probation with a 12-month actual suspension and until she provides proof of her rehabilitation and ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. The order took effect Aug. 23, 2013. In 2012, Wang stipulated to misconduct in three client matters: two counts of moral turpitude, two counts of failure to act with competence, seeking to mislead a court, the unauthorized practice of law in another jurisdiction and three counts of failure to cooperate in a State Bar investigation. The Supreme Court ultimately returned the matter to the State Bar for further consideration as to the appropriate level of discipline.In two of the matters she was disciplined for Wang lied to family law clients, telling them she had filed court documents in their cases when she hadn’t and in one case went as far as providing a client with falsified court documents. In both of the matters, Wang did not respond to State Bar investigators’ letters after disciplinary complaints were filed against her.In another matter, Wang represented her father’s company in a patent action in U. S. District Court, even though she was not admitted to the bar of that court, and misrepresented to the court that she had been authorized to represent the company on behalf of the law firm where she worked.In mitigation, Wang entered into an extensive stipulation admitting to her misconduct. |