Terry Romero Collins is an active member of the California Bar and was admitted 9th June 2003. Terry graduated from UC Hastings COL.

Lawyer Information

NameTerry Romero Collins
First Admitted9 June 2003 (21 years, 11 months ago)
StatusActive
Bar Number225677

Contact

Current Email[email protected]
Previous Email[email protected]
Previous Email[email protected]
Phone Number510-385-7048

Schools

Law SchoolUC Hastings COL (San Francisco CA)
Undergraduate SchoolSan Jose State University (San Jose CA)

Address

Current Address1830 Springs Rd
Vallejo, CA 94591-5555
Map
Previous AddressTerry R. Collins
1525 Sacramento St
Berkeley, CA 94702
Previous Address555 7th St
San Francisco, CA 94103-4709

History

29 February 2024Active (1 year, 2 months ago)
8 July 2011Disbarred (13 years, 10 months ago)
Disbarment 10-N-05933
28 January 2011Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 3 months ago)
Ordered inactive 10-N-05933
15 October 2010Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 6 months ago)
Ordered inactive 10-N-05933
25 April 2010Not eligible to practice law in CA (15 years ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 08-O-10113
23 September 2009Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 09-H-13756 (15 years, 7 months ago)
21 August 2008Public reproval with/duties 07-O-12116 (16 years, 8 months ago)
11 October 2007Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 07-O-12116 (17 years, 6 months ago)
9 June 2003Admitted to the State Bar of California (21 years, 11 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

July 8, 2011

TERRY ROMERO COLLINS [#225677], 40, of Oakland was disbarred July 8, 2011, and was ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court.

Collins was disciplined in March 2010, but did not comply with rule 9.20 as ordered. He did not file with the State Bar Court an affidavit stating that he notified his clients, opposing counsel and other interested parties of his suspension.

Collins had stipulated in three civil matters that he failed to account for client funds, return unearned fees, communicate with two clients, perform legal services competently, obey a court order and obtain a client’s written consent before accepting fees from a non-client. He also stipulated that he failed to comply with numerous conditions attached to a 2008 public reproval that was imposed for his failure to return unearned fees, account for client funds and cooperate with the bar’s investigation.