Gustavo Diaz was admitted to the California Bar 3rd June 2003, but has since been disbarred. Gustavo graduated from University of San Fernando Valley COL.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Gustavo Diaz |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 3 June 2003 (20 years, 11 months ago) |
| Status | Disbarred |
| Bar Number | 225402 |
| Practice Area | Criminal Law |
Contact
| Current Email | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Previous Email | [email protected] |
| Website | http://gustavo-diaz.com |
| Phone Number | 661-674-6252 |
Schools
| Law School | University of San Fernando Valley COL |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | California St University Northridge (CA) |
Address
| Current Address | Law Offices Of Gustavo Diaz, 40046 Becky Ln Palmdale, CA 93551-3608 |
|---|---|
| Map | |
| Previous Address | Law Offices Of Gustavo Diaz 17 Hammond Ste 412 Irvine, CA 92618 |
| Previous Address | Law Offices Of Gustavo Diaz 17 Hammond Ste 412 Irvine, CA 92618-1635 |
| Previous Address | Law Offices Of Gustavo Diaz 337 E Avenue K10 Lancaster, CA 93535-4539 |
History
| 28 November 2013 | Disbarred (10 years, 5 months ago) Disbarment 11-O-17164 |
|---|---|
| 20 June 2013 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 10 months ago) Ordered inactive 11-O-17164 |
| 12 August 2012 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (11 years, 8 months ago) Ordered inactive 11-O-17164 |
| 7 June 2012 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 11-O-17164 (11 years, 10 months ago) |
| 3 June 2003 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (20 years, 11 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
November 28, 2013 GUSTAVO DIAZ [#225402], 46, of Lancaster was disbarred Nov. 28, 2013 and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. Diaz’s default was entered because he did not file a response to three disciplinary charges filed against him in one client matter. He was disbarred under rule 5.85 of the State Bar Rules of Procedure because he did not move to have the default vacated within 180 days.The charges were deemed admitted. Diaz violated a court order and failed to perform legal services with competence by not appearing in court for the reading of the verdict in his client’s criminal matter, despite having been repeatedly admonished for excessive tardiness and under explicit court orders that he appear for the verdict reading or arrange for another attorney to make the appearance. Diaz also failed to participate in a disciplinary investigation by not responding to the charges filed against him. |
Languages
| Other Language Spoken by this Attorney | Spanish |
|---|---|
| Other Language Spoken by the Law Office Staff | Spanish |