Larry Scott Spears was admitted to the California Bar 10th June 1998, but has since been disbarred. Larry graduated from McGeorge SOL University of the Pacific.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Larry Scott Spears |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 10 June 1998 (27 years ago) |
| Status | Disbarred |
| Bar Number | 195993 |
Contact
| Current Email | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Phone Number | 202-657-6680 |
Schools
| Law School | McGeorge SOL University of the Pacific (CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | University of California Santa Barbara (CA) |
Address
| Current Address | L Scott Spears, 2465 Centreville Rd #J17-103 Herndon, VA 20171 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 9 August 2012 | Disbarred (12 years, 10 months ago) Disbarment 11-N-10004 |
|---|---|
| 13 January 2012 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (13 years, 5 months ago) Ordered inactive 11-N-10004 |
| 13 May 2011 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 1 month ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 09-O-13598 |
| 24 April 2011 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 1 month ago) Ordered inactive 11-N-10004 |
| 31 January 2011 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 11-N-10004 (14 years, 4 months ago) |
| 4 November 2010 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 7 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 09-H-15876 |
| 21 August 2010 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 10 months ago) Ordered inactive 09-O-13598 |
| 17 January 2010 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (15 years, 5 months ago) Ordered inactive 09-H-15876 |
| 12 October 2001 | Active (23 years, 8 months ago) |
| 23 October 1998 | Inactive (26 years, 8 months ago) |
| 10 June 1998 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (27 years ago) |
Discipline Summaries
August 9, 2012 LARRY SCOTT SPEARS, 50, of Herndon, Va., was disbarred Aug. 9, 2012, and was ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. By default, the State Bar Court found that Spears violated a rule 9.20 requirement that was part of a 2010 disciplinary order. He did not submit to the court a declaration that he notified his clients, opposing counsel and other interested parties that he was suspended. Because he did not participate in the proceedings, or try to have the default vacated within 180 days, he was disbarred.Spears was privately reproved in 2008 for failing to perform legal services competently. He was suspended in 2010 for failing to comply with the conditions of his reproval, and in 2011 he was again suspended for multiple acts of misconduct in two matters, including failures to perform legal services competently, communicate with clients or cooperate with the bar’s investigation, as well as dishonesty and improper withdrawal from employment. Because he did not participate in the 2010 and 2011 matters, his default was entered.November 4, 2010 LARRY SCOTT SPEARS [#195993], 47, of Herndon, Va., was suspended for two years, stayed, actually suspended for 90 days and until the State Bar Court grants a motion to terminate the suspension and was ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. If the actual suspension exceeds two years, he must prove his rehabilitation. The order took effect Nov. 4, 2010. Spears also was given a two-year stayed suspension and a one-year actual suspension May 13, 2011. He was ordered to comply with rule 9.20 and if the suspension exceeds two years, he must prove his rehabilitation. Spears defaulted in both matters.In the 2011 case, the court found that Spears committed numerous acts of misconduct, including failing to perform competently, communicate with a client, comply with reproval conditions or cooperate with the bar’s investigation and he improperly withdrew from employment. He was hired to prepare estate planning documents but did not do so and told the client the work was done. When she tried to contact him two months later, she found his phone had been disconnected with no new number.Spears also did not comply with conditions attached to a 2008 private reproval, imposed for his failure to perform legal services competently for one client. He submitted reports indicating he was in full compliance with the State Bar Act and Rules of Professional Conduct at the time he had abandoned the estate planning client.In another case, a lawsuit was dismissed because Spears didn’t serve the complaint. The dismissal was upheld by the court of appeal. Spears did not tell the clients about the dismissal.The November 2010 discipline was imposed for Spears’ failure to comply with the private reproval |