Mark Christopher Teuton was admitted to the California Bar 10th December 1996, but has since been disbarred. Mark graduated from Loyola Law School.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Mark Christopher Teuton |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 10 December 1996 (28 years, 4 months ago) |
| Status | Disbarred |
| Bar Number | 187433 |
Contact
| Current Email | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Phone Number | 949-822-3212 |
| Fax Number | 949-274-8151 |
Schools
| Law School | Loyola Law School (Los Angeles CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | See Registration Card |
Address
| Current Address | RAY & SEYB LLP, 2062 Business Center Dr, Ste 230 Irvine, CA 92612-1110 |
|---|---|
| Map | |
| Previous Address | TEUTON LAW FIRM 19700 Fairchild Ste 120 Irvine, CA 92612 |
| Previous Address | TEUTON LAW FIRM, 19700 Fairchild Ste 120 Irvine, CA 92612 |
History
| 29 May 2015 | Disbarred (9 years, 11 months ago) Disbarment 13-O-14191 |
|---|---|
| 13 December 2014 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 4 months ago) Ordered inactive 13-O-14191 |
| 1 August 2014 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 9 months ago) Ordered inactive 13-O-14191 |
| 29 July 2014 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 9 months ago) Suspended/Child & Fam Supp noncompliance |
| 1 July 2014 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 10 months ago) Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance |
| 25 March 2014 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 13-O-14191 (11 years, 1 month ago) |
| 30 August 2013 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (11 years, 8 months ago) Suspended/Child & Fam Supp noncompliance |
| 2 July 2013 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (11 years, 10 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
| 10 December 1996 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (28 years, 4 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
May 29, 2015 MARK CHRISTOPHER TEUTON [#187433], 51, of Irvine, was disbarred May 29, 2015 and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. Teuton was disbarred after his default was entered for failing to appear at trial in his disciplinary case. Because he did not seek to have the default set aside within 90 days as required under rule 5.85 of the State Bar’s Rules of Procedure, he was disbarred and the charges against him deemed admitted.Teuton committed seven acts of misconduct stemming from three client matters. In one matter, he failed to perform by not appearing on his clients’ behalf at four different court appearances. He also did not respond to client inquiries, report a judicial sanction or obey a court order.In another matter he effectively withdrew from employment without telling his employee and failed to respond to client inquiries. In the third matter, he failed to report to the State Bar that he had been sanctioned for not paying back spousal and child support. |