Glenn Richard Wilson is an active member of the California Bar and was admitted 30th October 1996. Glenn graduated from San Joaquin COL.

Lawyer Information

NameGlenn Richard Wilson
First Admitted30 October 1996 (27 years, 5 months ago)
StatusActive
Bar Number183727
SectionsFamily Law

Contact

Current Email[email protected]
Phone Number559-237-5297
Fax Number559-268-5297

Schools

Law SchoolSan Joaquin COL (Fresno CA)
Undergraduate SchoolCalifornia St University Fresno (Fresno CA)

Address

Current AddressLaw Ofcs Glenn Wilson, 2141 Tuolumne St Ste B
Fresno, CA 93721-1235
Map

History

3 July 2009Active (14 years, 9 months ago)
3 June 2009Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 10 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 08-PM-13648
2 May 2008Active (15 years, 11 months ago)
2 April 2008Not eligible to practice law in CA (15 years, 12 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 06-O-14524
22 May 2007Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 06-O-14524 (16 years, 10 months ago)
30 October 1996Admitted to the State Bar of California (27 years, 5 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

June 3, 2009

GLENN R. WILSON [#183727], 50, of Fresno was revoked and he was suspended for one year, stayed, and placed on 18 months of probation with a 30-day actual suspension. The order took effect June 3, 2009.

Wilson did not comply with the terms of a 2008 probation — he did not meet with his probation officer, file a probation report on time or make restitution on time. He did attend ethics school, took the MPRE and filed a quarterly report on time.

The underlying discipline was imposed after Wilson stipulated to five counts of misconduct in two matters, including practicing in a jurisdiction where he was not admitted, disobeying court orders, failing to account for client funds, refund unearned fees or perform legal services competently.

April 2, 2008

GLENN R. WILSON [#183727], 49, of Fresno was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on two years of probation with an actual 30-day suspension and was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect April 2, 2008.

Wilson stipulated to five counts of misconduct in two matters.

He substituted into a criminal appeal before the Ninth Circuit, although he was not admitted to practice there. He did not file an opening brief despite numerous orders and default orders, nor did he respond to an order to show cause.

Although he received $17,000 to handle the case, he did not provide an accounting of the money for two years, when the bar initiated an inquiry.

Wilson stipulated that he practiced in a jurisdiction where he was not admitted, disobeyed court orders, and he failed to account for client funds or perform legal services competently.

In a second criminal matter for which the client paid a $4,500 fee, Wilson was instructed to conduct a thorough investigation because witness issues were important to the outcome. Although he or another lawyer on his behalf made appearances, met briefly with the district attorney and reviewed a portion of the relevant documents, Wilson did not conduct a thorough investigation. Many witnesses were not interviewed, police audiotapes were not obtained and the client paid for and submitted to inadmissible testing on Wilson’s advice.

The client hired a new lawyer who promptly oversaw interviews of 20 witnesses and obtained police tapes. He demanded an accounting of the fees and a refund of unearned fees. Nearly two years later, Wilson provided the accounting and agreed to refund $2,000 as part of settlement negotiations in the bar case.

He stipulated that he failed to promptly refund unearned fees.

In mitigation, Wilson has no record of discipline and he cooperated with the bar’s investigation.