Edward Eungsuk Kim is an active member of the California Bar and was admitted 11th June 1996. Edward graduated from Tulane University Law School.

Lawyer Information

NameEdward Eungsuk Kim
First Admitted11 June 1996 (27 years, 10 months ago)
StatusActive
Bar Number183022
SectionsLabor & Employment

Contact

Current Email[email protected]
Previous Email[email protected]
Phone Number424-355-8535
Fax Number424-355-8535

Schools

Law SchoolTulane University Law School (New Orleans LA)
Undergraduate SchoolUniversity of California Berkeley (Berkeley CA)

Address

Current Address1915 Huntington Ln, Unit 2
Redondo Beach, CA 90278-4219
Map
Previous AddressLawyers for Workplace Fairness, APC
4100 W Alameda Ave Fl 3
Burbank, CA 91505
Previous AddressLawyers for Workplace Fairness, APC
4100 W Alameda Ave Fl 3
Burbank, CA 91505-4191
Previous AddressMahoney Law Group, APC, 249 E Ocean Blvd, Ste 814
Long Beach, CA 90802-4899
Previous AddressWork Lawyers, PC, 22939 Hawthorne Blvd, Unit 202
Torrance, CA 90505-3681

History

23 June 2010Active (13 years, 10 months ago)
25 December 2008Not eligible to practice law in CA (15 years, 4 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 06-O-15097
16 August 2007Not eligible to practice law in CA (16 years, 8 months ago)
Suspended, failed to pay fees
18 September 2006Not eligible to practice law in CA (17 years, 7 months ago)
Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance
16 March 2001Active (23 years, 1 month ago)
27 September 1999Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years, 7 months ago)
Suspended, failed to pay fees
11 June 1996Admitted to the State Bar of California (27 years, 10 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

December 25, 2008

EDWARD E. KIM [#183022], 41, of Huntington Beach was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on two years of probation with an actual 60-day suspension and he was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect Dec. 25, 2008.

Kim was suspended in 2006 for failing to comply with MCLE requirements. Shortly before the suspension, he began a job with a law firm without informing anyone at the firm of his status. When his employers learned he was not entitled to practice, Kim falsely told them he was unaware of his suspension and that he had received no notice from the bar. He was fired.

He stipulated that he held himself out as entitled to practice when he was not active and he committed acts of moral turpitude.

In mitigation, Kim has no record of discipline and no clients were harmed.