Reza Panah was admitted to the California Bar 6th December 1995, but has since been disbarred. Reza graduated from Thomas Jefferson SOL.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Reza Panah |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 6 December 1995 (29 years, 5 months ago) |
| Status | Disbarred |
| Bar Number | 179557 |
Contact
| Current Email | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Phone Number | 310-278-5860 |
| Fax Number | 310-276-3804 |
Schools
| Law School | Thomas Jefferson SOL (San Diego CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | University of Southern Calif (Los Angeles CA) |
Address
| Current Address | P O Box 6414 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 27 March 2004 | Disbarred (21 years, 1 month ago) Disbarment 02-N-14821 |
|---|---|
| 12 October 2003 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (21 years, 6 months ago) Ordered inactive 02-N-14821 |
| 1 August 2003 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (21 years, 9 months ago) Ordered inactive 02-N-14821 |
| 1 August 2003 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (21 years, 9 months ago) Ordered inactive 02-C-10964 |
| 31 October 2002 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 02-N-14821 (22 years, 6 months ago) |
| 4 September 2002 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years, 8 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
| 3 September 2002 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years, 8 months ago) Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance |
| 20 August 2002 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years, 8 months ago) Interim suspension after conviction 02-C-12310 |
| 17 August 2002 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years, 8 months ago) Interim suspension after conviction 02-C-13150 |
| 12 July 2002 | Conviction records transmitted to State Bar Court (22 years, 9 months ago) |
| 12 June 2000 | Active (24 years, 10 months ago) |
| 8 August 1999 | Inactive (25 years, 9 months ago) |
| 6 December 1995 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (29 years, 5 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
March 27, 2004 REZA PANAH [#179557], 36, of Beverly Hills was disbarred March 27, 2004, and was ordered to comply with rule 955. In a default proceeding, the State Bar Court found that Panah did not comply with rule 955, as ordered by an interim suspension imposed in 2002 following a conviction for grand theft. Panah was separately convicted of grand theft in another matter the same day.In addition, he was convicted of trespass |