Santa Clarita, CA 91380
7 February 2010 | Disbarred (14 years, 2 months ago) Disbarment 08-N-14804 |
---|---|
5 September 2009 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 7 months ago) Ordered inactive 08-N-14804 |
26 August 2009 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 8 months ago) Suspended/Child & Fam Supp noncompliance |
8 June 2009 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 10 months ago) Ordered inactive 08-N-14804 |
17 February 2009 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 08-N-14804 (15 years, 2 months ago) |
26 September 2008 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (15 years, 7 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 07-H-11902 |
6 January 2008 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (16 years, 3 months ago) Ordered inactive 07-H-11902 |
4 October 2007 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 07-H-11902 (16 years, 7 months ago) |
3 May 2006 | Public reproval with/duties 05-O-02322 (17 years, 12 months ago) |
25 January 2006 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 05-O-02322 (18 years, 3 months ago) |
16 September 2005 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (18 years, 7 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
7 July 2005 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (18 years, 9 months ago) Suspended/Child & Fam Supp noncompliance |
10 November 2004 | Active (19 years, 5 months ago) |
23 August 2004 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (19 years, 8 months ago) Suspended/Child & Fam Supp noncompliance |
3 October 1994 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (29 years, 7 months ago) |
February 7, 2010 SEAN LYMUS ANDREWS [#171711], 51, of Santa Clarita was disbarred Feb. 7, 2010, and was ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. In a default proceeding, the State Bar Court found that Andrews failed to comply with a rule 9.20 order that was part of a 2008 discipline. He did not submit to the bar court an affidavit stating that he notified his clients, courts, opposing counsel and other interested parties of his suspension. Failure to comply with rule 9.20 is grounds for disbarment.Andrews was suspended in 2008 for failing to comply with conditions attached to a 2006 public reproval that was imposed for not performing legal services competently.September 26, 2008 SEAN L. ANDREWS [#171711], 49, of Santa Clarita was suspended for two years, stayed, actually suspended for 90 days and until the State Bar Court grants a motion to terminate the suspension, and he was ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 9.20. If the actual suspension exceeds two years, he must prove his rehabilitation. The order took effect Sept. 26, 2008. In a default proceeding, the State Bar Court found that Andrews violated the terms of a probation attached to a 2006 public reproval. He did not meet with a probation deputy, submit quarterly reports or provide proof that he attended ethics school or took the MPRE. The underlying discipline was imposed for failing to perform legal services competently in a single matter. |