Kim Trong Nguyen was first admitted to the California Bar 14th December 1992, but is now no longer eligible to practice. Kim graduated from UCLA SOL.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Kim Trong Nguyen |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 14 December 1992 (32 years, 4 months ago) |
| Status | Not Eligible to Practice |
| Bar Number | 162783 |
Contact
| Phone Number | 949-204-9507 |
|---|---|
| Fax Number | 949-612-2557 |
Schools
| Law School | UCLA SOL (Los Angeles CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | University of California Irvine (Irvine CA) |
Address
| Current Address | Kim Nguyen, 13217 Jamboree Rd # 300 Tustin, CA 92782-9158 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 1 October 2020 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (4 years, 7 months ago) Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance |
|---|---|
| 2 July 2013 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (11 years, 10 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
| 29 September 2012 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (12 years, 7 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 12-PM-12885 |
| 11 June 2012 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (12 years, 10 months ago) Ordered inactive 12-PM-12885 |
| 30 December 2011 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (13 years, 4 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 09-O-19074 |
| 21 July 2011 | Active (13 years, 9 months ago) |
| 1 July 2011 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (13 years, 10 months ago) Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance |
| 5 May 2011 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 09-O-19074 (14 years ago) |
| 3 September 2010 | Active (14 years, 8 months ago) |
| 1 September 2010 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 8 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
| 29 August 2002 | Public reproval with/duties 02-O-10917 (22 years, 8 months ago) |
| 17 September 2001 | Active (23 years, 7 months ago) |
| 1 September 2001 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (23 years, 8 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
| 5 November 1999 | Active (25 years, 6 months ago) |
| 27 September 1999 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (25 years, 7 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
| 14 December 1992 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (32 years, 4 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
September 29, 2012 The probation of KIM TRONG NGUYEN, 44, of Tustin was revoked and he was suspended for three years and until he makes restitution to two clients and proves his rehabilitation, and he was ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. The order took effect Sept. 29, 2012. Nguyen violated the terms of a 2011 probation by failing to timely contact the State Bar probation office, make restitution, submit an acceptable law office management plan, file a quarterly report on time because of a defect, or meet the deadline to join the bar’s Law Practice Management and Technology Section.In the underlying matter, Nguyen stipulated to misconduct in five matters, including failures to communicate with clients, account for client funds, obey court orders, maintain client funds in trust, refund unearned fees or cooperate with the bar’s investigation. He also misappropriated funds, committing an act of moral turpitude.In addition, Nguyen was publicly reproved in 2002 for failing to obey a court order or communicate with a client.He did not participate in the revocation proceedings.December 30, 2011 KIM TRONG NGUYEN [#162783], 44, of Tustin was suspended for three years, stayed, placed on three years of probation with an actual two-year suspension and until he proves his rehabilitation, and he was ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. The order took effect Dec. 30, 2011. Nguyen stipulated to 20 counts of misconduct in five cases. In three matters, he failed to perform legal services competently: he did not file one complaint or various documents associated with his clients’ claims. He didn’t respond to two clients’ requests for information about their cases. He did not account for or refund advance fees from three clients.He also didn’t properly maintain client funds in his client trust account, misappropriated funds, disobeyed court orders and failed to cooperate with the bar’s investigation.In a wrongful termination and civil rights case, for example, Nguyen failed to appear at a telephonic status conference, respond to the email and voicemail messages from the defendant, file an opposition to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment or respond to its message seeking confirmation that Nguyen was still committed to a mediation. He violated a court order by not cooperating in setting a mediation date until it was no longer practical to do so by the court’s deadline, and he didn’t refund the client’s advance $3,500 fee or account for the money.Nguyen was privately reproved in 2002. In mitigation, he cooperated with the bar’s investigation. |