Providence, RI 02908
12 February 2000 | Disbarred (25 years, 4 months ago) Disbarment 98-N-02757 |
---|---|
18 September 1999 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (25 years, 8 months ago) Ordered inactive 98-N-02757 |
3 September 1999 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (25 years, 9 months ago) Ordered inactive 98-N-02757 |
6 May 1999 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 98-H-02757 (26 years, 1 month ago) |
29 January 1998 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (27 years, 4 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 95-O-17472 |
18 May 1997 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (28 years ago) Ordered inactive 97-H-11052 |
7 April 1997 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (28 years, 2 months ago) Ordered inactive 95-O-17472 |
18 March 1997 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 97-H-11052 (28 years, 2 months ago) |
10 February 1997 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 95-O-17472 (28 years, 4 months ago) |
22 February 1996 | Public reproval with/duties 94-O-17737 (29 years, 3 months ago) |
21 July 1995 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 94-O-17737 (29 years, 10 months ago) |
14 December 1992 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (32 years, 6 months ago) |
February 12, 2000 DAVID RICHARD RANCOURT [#161461], 34, of Providence, R.I., was disbarred Feb. 12, 2000, and was ordered to comply with rule 955. Rancourt did not comply with a 1998 rule 955 requirement by not filing the required affidavit with the Supreme Court.The earlier discipline was imposed for Rancourt’s failure to comply with the conditions of a public reproval and for failing to properly represent a client.The reproval was based on misconduct affecting an incarcerated client, with whom Rancourt did not communicate and for whom he failed to perform legal services.Rancourt’s default was entered when he failed to participate in the disbarment proceeding.January 29, 1998 DAVID R. RANCOURT [#161461], 33, of Providence, R.I., was suspended for one year, stayed, and placed on probation for one year on the condition that he is actually suspended for 60 days and until he makes restitution. If he is actually suspended for two years or more, he will remain suspended until he has provided proof of his fitness to practice. He was ordered to pass the MPRE and comply with rule 955. The order was effective Jan. 29, 1998.In a divorce matter, Rancourt abandoned his client, failed to complete legal services, communicate and return unearned fees.Rancourt also failed to meet conditions of a 1996 public reproval when he failed to attend the bar's ethics school and pass the MPRE.He did not participate in the disciplinary proceedings. Although he mentioned an illness in one letter to bar investigators, Rancourt did not offer his physical ailment as a factor in mitigation.Considered in aggravation was the fact that his client completed his divorce petition on his own and was not refunded unearned legal fees by Rancourt. |