Riverside, CA 92501
19 October 2013 | Disbarred (10 years, 6 months ago) Disbarment 12-O-10776 |
---|---|
4 May 2013 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (11 years ago) Ordered inactive 12-O-10776 |
24 June 2012 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (11 years, 10 months ago) Ordered inactive 12-O-10776 |
19 April 2012 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 12-O-10776 (12 years ago) |
13 August 2011 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (12 years, 9 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 09-C-11825 |
1 September 2010 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (13 years, 8 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
29 June 2010 | Conviction record transmitted to State Bar Court 09-C-11825 (13 years, 10 months ago) |
24 March 2010 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 1 month ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 08-H-11721 |
10 July 2009 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 10 months ago) Ordered inactive 08-H-11721 |
1 July 2009 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 10 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
6 November 2007 | Public reproval with/duties 06-C-14973 (16 years, 6 months ago) |
1 June 2007 | Conviction record transmitted to State Bar Court 06-C-14973 (16 years, 11 months ago) |
8 June 1992 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (31 years, 11 months ago) |
October 19, 2013 JASON R. WALSH [#158471], 46, of Riverside was disbarred Oct. 19, 2013 and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. Walsh’s default was entered in 2012 after he failed to respond to the notice of disciplinary charges filed against him. Because he made no effort to vacate the default within 180 days, the State Bar moved to disbar him, and the charges were deemed admitted.Walsh failed to comply with the conditions of his 2011 suspension following his conviction for possession of assault weapon, possession of a controlled substance and being under the influence of a controlled substance. Walsh was also disciplined in 2010, following a default proceeding in which the State Bar Court found that Walsh violated 13 terms of a 2007 public reproval imposed following a conviction for driving under the influence with a prior. Among other things, he filed three quarterly probation reports late, failed to undergo a substance abuse evaluation or attend ethics school and did not comply with addiction treatment conditions.August 13, 2011 JASON ROBERT WALSH [#158471], 44, of Riverside was suspended for three years, stayed, placed on three years of probation with a tow-year actual suspension and until he proves his rehabilitation and he was ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. The order took effect Aug.13, 2011. Walsh was convicted in 2010 of four misdemeanors -- possession of assault weapon, possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine, possession of marijuana and being under the influence of a controlled substance. The convictions warranted the imposition of discipline.Walsh failed to appear in court twice while representing a criminal defendant who paid him a $1,000 advance fee. He did not refund the fee, as requested by the client.He was publicly reproved in 2007 and was given a stayed suspension and placed in probation in 2010 for violating probation conditions.March 24, 2010 JASON ROBERT WALSH [#158471], 43, of Riverside was suspended for two years, stayed, actually suspended for one year and until the State Bar Court grants a motion to terminate the suspension and he was ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. If the actual suspension exceeds two years, he must prove his rehabilitation. The order took effect March 24, 2010. In a default proceeding, the State Bar Court found that Walsh violated 13 terms of a 2007 public reproval imposed following a conviction for driving under the influence with a prior. Among other things, he filed three quarterly probation reports late, failed to undergo a substance abuse evaluation or attend ethics school and he did not comply with addiction treatment conditions.In mitigation, he has no prior discipline record and he cooperated with the bar’s investigation. |