Hal Erwin Wright was admitted to the California Bar 7th April 1992, but has since been disbarred. Hal graduated from Lincoln Law School.

Lawyer Information

NameHal Erwin Wright
First Admitted7 April 1992 (32 years, 1 month ago)
StatusDisbarred
Bar Number157814

Schools

Law SchoolLincoln Law School (Sacramento CA)
Undergraduate SchoolCalifornia St University Sacramento (CA)

Address

Current Address216 F St
Davis, CA 95616
Map

History

23 May 2014Disbarred (9 years, 11 months ago)
Disbarment 12-O-16850
23 December 2013Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 4 months ago)
Ordered inactive 12-O-16850
2 November 2013Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 6 months ago)
Ordered inactive 12-O-16850
2 July 2013Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 10 months ago)
Suspended, failed to pay fees
14 June 2013Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 10 months ago)
Inactive - Irreparable injury (6007c) 13-TE-12119
23 April 2013Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 12-O-16850 (11 years ago)
1 October 2012Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 12-O-13203 (11 years, 7 months ago)
4 October 2011Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 10-O-10808 (12 years, 7 months ago)
8 November 2001Active (22 years, 5 months ago)
19 October 2001Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years, 6 months ago)
Ordered Inactive/Fee Arb/B&P 6203
23 December 1999Active (24 years, 4 months ago)
27 September 1999Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years, 7 months ago)
Suspended, failed to pay fees
7 April 1992Admitted to the State Bar of California (32 years, 1 month ago)

Discipline Summaries

June 23, 2014

Davis attorney disbarred over forgery and multiple thefts of client funds

A Northern California attorney has been stripped of his law license for misconduct that included pretending he was moving forward with a client’s personal injury suit and secretly siphoning his settlement money. HAL ERWIN WRIGHT [#157814], 60, of Davis was disbarred May 23, 2014 and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court and make restitution.

Wright stipulated to misconduct in two client matters, including multiple acts of moral turpitude and failures to perform legal services with competence, promptly notify a client of the receipt of funds, refund unearned fees or render appropriate accounts to a client. He was ordered to pay $58,000 plus interest in restitution.

In 2010, Steve Isaacson suffered injuries in a fall at the Big Idea Theater in Sacramento and asked Wright to represent him in a personal injury suit. Unbeknownst to Isaacson, on April 1, 2011 Wright settled his claim with the theater for a sum of $40,000, far less than the suit was worth. That day, Wright forged Isaacson’s and Isaacson’s wife’s signature on a release and sent it to the Northland Insurance Co., which issued two checks to settle the claim.

Wright forged Isaacson and his wife’s signatures on the checks and deposited them into his client trust account, eventually moving the money to another checking account and spending it. He also told Isaacson he planned to file a suit for medical malpractice to address the care Isaacson received after his fall, but never did. Isaacson gave Wright a check for $390 written to the Sacramento County Superior Court to cover filing fees for the new case, but Wright altered the check to make it payable to him, taking the money for himself.

From the beginning of his representation of Isaacson in September 2010 until January 2013, he lied to his client on numerous occasions, saying he was working on his personal injury lawsuit when, in fact, he had never filed one.

On Oct. 9, 2012, for example, Wright sent Isaacson an email which said, “Hi Steve, still working on getting you some jingle.” In another email in January of that year he wrote, “It sickens me that you are still in pain and I’m trying my best with these ‘suits’ but thinking outside the box/bun is not their forte.”

Meanwhile, Isaacson, in his capacity as a board member and vice president of the Davis Musical Theater Company, hired Wright for another matter – to help obtain money that a patron had left the theater in her will. Once he received a check from the trustee of the estate, Wright paid Isaacson $3,000 of the $15,000 received, pocketing the rest. He never told Isaacson the money was from the trust, saying instead that it was a partial payment from the insurance company on the personal injury matter.

Wright’s other misconduct stemmed from a matter in which a couple hired him to obtain a trademark for their towing company. Steven and Kathleen Ramirez also retained Wright in 2010 to file paperwork for two limited liability corporations and to seek to vacate a judgment against them. The Ramirezes paid Wright $3,000 in advance for his services but he did not do any work on their behalf, lying to them by telling them he had sent in their copyright application when he had not.

In February 2012, Kathleen Ramirez emailed him requesting an accounting and a full refund, but he provided neither. The couple hired a new attorney who demanded the money from Wright. He only made one payment of $500 on June 8, 2012.

Wright had two prior records of discipline, the earliest of which was a 2003 private reproval for failures to perform, refund an unearned fee or maintain disputed funds in trust. On March 28, 2013, the State Bar Court recommended he receive an actual 18-month suspension for misconduct in two client matters including moral turpitude, misrepresenting to clients the status of their legal matters and falsely reporting his Minimum Continuing Legal Education requirements. At the time of his stipulation the case was on appeal.