Tustin, CA 92781
17 June 2016 | Disbarred (9 years ago) Disbarment 09-O-17017 |
---|---|
22 October 2015 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (9 years, 8 months ago) Ordered inactive 09-O-17017 |
29 October 2014 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 09-O-17019 (10 years, 7 months ago) |
18 July 2014 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 11 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 09-C-12545 |
24 August 2012 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (12 years, 9 months ago) Ordered inactive 09-C-12545 |
2 December 2011 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 11-O-17317 (13 years, 6 months ago) |
27 October 2009 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (15 years, 7 months ago) Vol.inactive(tender of resign.w/charges) 09-Q-16797 |
16 October 2009 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (15 years, 8 months ago) Interim suspension after conviction 09-C-12545 |
31 August 2009 | Conviction record transmitted to State Bar Court 09-C-12545 (15 years, 9 months ago) |
14 June 1991 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (34 years ago) |
June 17, 2016 JAMES MAZI PARSA [#153389], 51, of Tustin, was disbarred June 17, 2016 and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court and make restitution. In October 2009, Parsa became ineligible to practice law and shut down his thriving law practice due to convictions for unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor. Even though his suspension was imminent, he continued to accept new clients – many of whom were vulnerable and facing foreclosure and bankruptcy – and accept advanced fees. He did not notify any clients he was about to close his office before he did so or let any of his contract attorneys know. As a result, he was charged with misconduct in 43 client matters including failing to return more than $120,000 in unearned fees, improperly withdrawing from employment, failing to perform with competence and committing acts of moral turpitude.Parsa ultimately submitted his resignation with charges pending and the State Bar assumed jurisdiction over his practice. Parsa also hired an attorney to help him properly comply with rule 9.20 and instructed his office manager to send out notices to all of his 4,500 clients with active files. Many of his clients, however, did not receive the letters.Parsa was ordered to pay $120,464 plus interest in restitution. |