Cesar Enrique Trevino was admitted to the California Bar 10th June 1991, but has since been disbarred. Cesar graduated from Thomas Jefferson SOL.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Cesar Enrique Trevino |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 10 June 1991 (34 years ago) |
| Status | Disbarred |
| Bar Number | 153117 |
Contact
| Phone Number | 619-239-9666 |
|---|
Schools
| Law School | Thomas Jefferson SOL (San Diego CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | See Registration Card |
Address
| Current Address | 860 Union St San Diego, CA 92101 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 20 May 1998 | Disbarred (27 years ago) Disbarment 96-N-05943 |
|---|---|
| 27 November 1997 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (27 years, 6 months ago) Ordered inactive 96-N-05943 |
| 7 August 1997 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (27 years, 10 months ago) Ordered inactive 96-N-05943 |
| 30 April 1997 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 96-N-05943 (28 years, 1 month ago) |
| 30 April 1997 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 97-N-10169 (28 years, 1 month ago) |
| 27 November 1996 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (28 years, 6 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 95-O-11878 |
| 9 June 1996 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (29 years ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 94-H-19122 |
| 14 August 1995 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (29 years, 10 months ago) Ordered inactive 95-O-11878 |
| 21 June 1995 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 95-O-11878 (29 years, 11 months ago) |
| 2 March 1995 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 94-H-19122 (30 years, 3 months ago) |
| 1 September 1994 | Private reproval, public disclosure 92-O-17996 (30 years, 9 months ago) |
| 8 December 1993 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 92-O-17996 (31 years, 6 months ago) |
| 10 June 1991 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (34 years ago) |
Discipline Summaries
May 20, 1998 CESAR ENRIQUE TREVINO [#153117], 37, of San Diego was disbarred May 20, 1998, and ordered to comply with rule 955. Trevino failed to file affidavits of compliance with rule 955 as ordered in May and October 1996.His prior record of discipline was considered an aggravating factor. In August 1996, Trevino was privately reproved after he vouched for his client in a bail hearing. Despite knowing that her departure from the jurisdiction was a violation of her bond conditions, he took his client to Las Vegas in order to marry her. On a second occasion, Trevino boarded a plane with the former client, knowing that the contemplated departure was a violation of her bond.In May 1996, Trevino received a 90-day actual suspension for misconduct which included his failure to comply with conditions attached to the private reproval. He also failed to keep his membership records current with the State Bar.In October 1996, Trevino received a one-year suspension for failing to file a satisfaction of judgment as ordered by the municipal court.The bar court found that since Trevino defaulted in the disbarment proceedings, no mitigating or extenuating factors were presented or found.“It would undermine the integrity of the discipline system and damage public confidence in the legal profession if [Trevino] were not disbarred for his unexplained and wilful disobedience of two Supreme Court orders,†wrote the bar court judge.November 27, 1996 CESAR ENRIQUE TREVINO [#153117], 35, of San Diego was actually suspended for one year and until he proves his rehabilitation, and was ordered to comply with rule 955. The order took effect Nov. 27, 1996. In a default proceeding, the State Bar Court found that Trevino failed to perform legal services and violated a court order when he did not file a satisfaction of judgment in a civil action. Trevino has two prior disciplines. He was privately reproved in 1994 after he went to Nevada to marry a client who was granted bail on the condition that she not leave San Diego County. She later hired a new lawyer.When he violated the conditions of his reproval, he was placed on two years of probation.June 9, 1996 CESAR E. TREVINO [#153117], 35, of San Diego was suspended for two years, stayed, and placed on probation for two years with 90 days actual suspension, effective June 9, 1996. He was ordered to comply with rule 955. In this decision, the hearing department of the State Bar Court found Trevino culpable of failing to comply with conditions of a Sept. 1, 1994, private reproval and failing to maintain a current address with the bar's membership office.Considered an aggravating factor was the 1994 private reproval he received for violating Professional Rule of Conduct 3-210, which prohibits an attorney from advising the violation of any law unless the member believes in good faith that the law or ruling is invalid. He also failed to participate in the formal disciplinary proceedings.No mitigation was offered since Trevino did not participate in the State Bar Court's proceedings. Trevino was admitted to the bar in 1991. |